On TV.com: LATE LATE SHOW: Craig's Monologue 12/7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
There is not really enough in this article to tell
whether or not what this company has to offer is open to all or selected ones who meet their criteria. I imagine we'll soon be reading about who has taken them up on their offer and/or who has been refused.
Posted by: Taz_z   Posted on: 11/10/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Really, this is the only to beat the patent system.  DonnieBoy | 11/10/05
Who is this 'we' you keep talking about?  Real World | 11/10/05
No that would be  Linux Advocate | 11/10/05
I'm betting (b)  Real World | 11/10/05
mjb... I am sorry but  Linux Advocate | 11/10/05
So, just to be clear...  LoCal | 11/10/05
Damn right  Real World | 11/10/05
It clearly shows the stupidity of Software Patents. (NT)  Update victim | 11/12/05
Alliance may be illegal...  Mike Cox | 11/10/05
5.0  Linux_4u! | 11/10/05
That's Great Mike  OldMarine | 11/10/05
And the M$ preload only CARTEL isn't? . (NT)  Update victim | 11/12/05
Not good enough  Nigel Johnstone | 11/10/05
Fight fire with fire  Taz_z | 11/10/05
Taz, None, but I thats not the point  Nigel Johnstone | 11/10/05
The point of this to me is that it could make people comfortable  Taz_z | 11/10/05
I don't see how it fixes this  Nigel Johnstone | 11/10/05
question  vladsim | 11/10/05
Sony?  palmwarrior | 11/10/05
Any idea what Playstations run?  Taz_z | 11/10/05
Let me guess....  java.user | 11/10/05
My bad, maybe this has something to do with their involvement  Taz_z | 11/10/05
AFAIK  thetargos | 11/11/05
Actually, this is bad news....  techboy_z | 11/10/05
I think this paragraph answers your question  Taz_z | 11/10/05
Not really, cuz....  techboy_z | 11/10/05
There is not really enough in this article to tell  Taz_z | 11/10/05
yes there is  vladsim | 11/10/05
Linux backers form patent-sharing firm  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
Put up or shut up  techboy_z | 11/10/05
I choose option A  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
Munich?  IT_User | 11/10/05
Perhaps  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
Counterexamples  techboy_z | 11/10/05
Kremlinware  osreinstall | 11/10/05
Kremlinware?  Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
I know this is just bait  IT_User | 11/10/05
The title was, but you guys aren't innocent either.  osreinstall | 11/10/05
Interesting Microsoft tech isn't acceptable.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/05
Isn't it?  voska | 11/10/05
Did you post to the right article?  Taz_z | 11/10/05
Who says it isn't?  IT_User | 11/10/05
Interesting twist  Anti_Zealot | 11/10/05
GPL covers copyright not patents.  osreinstall | 11/10/05
Now, think about that statement for a sec, Axey:  Judas I. | 11/10/05
Oh butterball  java.user | 11/10/05
"encumbered" source  Taz_z | 11/10/05
Ironic  java.user | 11/10/05
Calm down, I'm not knocking Microsoft's efforts  Taz_z | 11/10/05
More, yes  rapson | 11/10/05
You are exactly correct  Taz_z | 11/10/05
GPL v. encumberance  mdsmedia | 11/11/05
Actually  java.user | 11/11/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline