Really, this is the only to beat the patent system.
DonnieBoy | 11/10/05
|
Who is this 'we' you keep talking about?
Real World | 11/10/05
|
No that would be
Linux Advocate | 11/10/05
|
I'm betting (b)
Real World | 11/10/05
|
|
mjb... I am sorry but
Linux Advocate | 11/10/05
|
|
So, just to be clear...
LoCal | 11/10/05
|
|
Damn right
Real World | 11/10/05
|
|
It clearly shows the stupidity of Software Patents. (NT)
Update victim | 11/12/05
|
|
Alliance may be illegal...
Mike Cox | 11/10/05
|
|
5.0
Linux_4u! | 11/10/05
|
|
That's Great Mike
OldMarine | 11/10/05
|
|
And the M$ preload only CARTEL isn't? . (NT)
Update victim | 11/12/05
|
|
Not good enough
Nigel Johnstone | 11/10/05
|
|
Fight fire with fire
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
Taz, None, but I thats not the point
Nigel Johnstone | 11/10/05
|
|
The point of this to me is that it could make people comfortable
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
I don't see how it fixes this
Nigel Johnstone | 11/10/05
|
|
question
vladsim | 11/10/05
|
|
Sony?
palmwarrior | 11/10/05
|
|
Any idea what Playstations run?
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
Let me guess....
java.user | 11/10/05
|
|
My bad, maybe this has something to do with their involvement
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
AFAIK
thetargos | 11/11/05
|
|
Actually, this is bad news....
techboy_z | 11/10/05
|
|
I think this paragraph answers your question
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
Not really, cuz....
techboy_z | 11/10/05
|
|
There is not really enough in this article to tell
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
yes there is
vladsim | 11/10/05
|
|
Linux backers form patent-sharing firm
Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
|
|
Put up or shut up
techboy_z | 11/10/05
|
|
I choose option A
Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
|
|
Munich?
IT_User | 11/10/05
|
|
Perhaps
Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
|
|
Counterexamples
techboy_z | 11/10/05
|
|
Kremlinware
osreinstall | 11/10/05
|
|
Kremlinware?
Loverock Davidson | 11/10/05
|
|
I know this is just bait
IT_User | 11/10/05
|
|
The title was, but you guys aren't innocent either.
osreinstall | 11/10/05
|
|
Interesting Microsoft tech isn't acceptable.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/10/05
|
|
Isn't it?
voska | 11/10/05
|
|
Did you post to the right article?
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
Who says it isn't?
IT_User | 11/10/05
|
|
Interesting twist
Anti_Zealot | 11/10/05
|
|
GPL covers copyright not patents.
osreinstall | 11/10/05
|
|
Now, think about that statement for a sec, Axey:
Judas I. | 11/10/05
|
|
Oh butterball
java.user | 11/10/05
|
|
"encumbered" source
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
Ironic
java.user | 11/10/05
|
|
Calm down, I'm not knocking Microsoft's efforts
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
More, yes
rapson | 11/10/05
|
|
You are exactly correct
Taz_z | 11/10/05
|
|
GPL v. encumberance
mdsmedia | 11/11/05
|
|
Actually
java.user | 11/11/05
|
