On mySimon: The Double-Daring Book for Girls
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 22:
Next »
« Previous
Lets ignore 2 things...
1. The BIG BUCKS!
2. The patent itself.

Basically Microsoft has said:
"We don't care if court says we're guilty. We're gonna continue with business as usual."
Posted by: Cardinal_Bill   Posted on: 01/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

makes sense  blahblahblah | 01/29/04
the facts  stephen732@... | 01/29/04
Think  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/30/04
it is their patent  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
Be careful there...  quietLee | 01/30/04
Invention is patentable.  John Le'Brecage | 01/30/04
IANAL (god I LOVE that acronym)...  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/30/04
ie is "free"  ryusen | 01/30/04
Um..  Patrick Jones | 01/30/04
Sorry, JC... you missed some facts.  John Le'Brecage | 01/30/04
Trouble is, we're all waiting anmd seeing.  DanIelWalker_z | 01/30/04
ms is not waiting  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
MS might know something about the patent office  dg mh | 01/29/04
Yeah, might  IT_User | 01/29/04
Lets ignore 2 things...  Cardinal_Bill | 01/29/04
Dude, calm duwn  rock06r | 01/30/04
Let us push aside prior art  FilledOut | 01/30/04
Microsoft's claim of Prior Art is False...  John Le'Brecage | 01/30/04
Notes prior art  FilledOut | 01/30/04
Patent office run by dept of motor vehicles  Prognosticator | 01/30/04
they could call it  JWatson77 | 01/30/04
wow  JWatson77 | 01/30/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here