Good move!
dr praetorius | 01/29/04
|
Talk about a great way to go out of business!
Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
|
This should be in Java, think cost, security, and cross platform.
DonnieBoy | 01/29/04
|

he, he, he...
dg mh | 01/29/04
|
 
You Are Correct ...
coffeenite | 01/29/04
|

Not a Very Smart Egg ...
coffeenite | 01/29/04
|
 
Hmm, vaporware? How is it that I'm running it?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
  
Great idea
zd-spam | 01/29/04
|
  
Well, you also think lying in a court of law...
Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
|
  
Oh?
rpmyers1 | 01/29/04
|
   
You mean like Linux betas?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
    
Public download
rpmyers1 | 01/29/04
|
     
Sure can.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
    
Whinger
rkhalloran | 01/29/04
|

What are you talking about?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
 
Bitty bragging about brochureware...boring
zd-spam | 01/29/04
|
 
noax, you're almost right
km4hr@... | 01/29/04
|
  
Uh huh, just keep watching.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|

Java???
Doug@... | 01/29/04
|
 
Machine?
IT_User | 01/29/04
|

no kidding
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|
Just the begining folks.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|

So you would ...
dr praetorius | 01/29/04
|
 
Good Grief! Read the article!!!
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
  
Nope
dr praetorius | 01/29/04
|
   
Huh?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
    
Name a service
rpmyers1 | 01/29/04
|
     
Java? The only jave I want to see is coffee.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
     
gee - leave it to no-axe
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|
    
Would you feel the same
dr praetorius | 01/29/04
|
     
Um, there are.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
    
RE: Caller ID
JakAttak | 01/29/04
|
     
Exactly right!!!
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
     
ms callerid
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|
     
re : caller id
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|

But what if there's no big uptake for Longhorn???
Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
|
 
A false argument to be sure.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
  
Linux marketshare CANNOT be guaged!
Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
|
   
Not according to Netcraft...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
  
Current marketshare?
IT_User | 01/29/04
|

Wow, a return to client-server architectures
B.O.F.H. | 01/29/04
|
 
Not gonna happen
IT_User | 01/29/04
|

Clue about what?
Chad_z | 01/29/04
|
Ok, so we're going backwards again, eh?
jwhanon | 01/29/04
|

There is no "browser".
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
 
What do you mean?
FirstNLastN | 01/29/04
|
  
Go slow..Bittie will believe any tripe M$ spoon feeds to him
Bobby Sskcat | 01/29/04
|
   
Tell you what little one.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
    
results - hahahahahahaha
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|
  
You lost me...
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
 
Side benefit
zd-spam | 01/29/04
|
  
It's easy to know when you've won a debate.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/29/04
|
   
No_Ax, you have resorted to the name calling gutter many times!
B.O.F.H. | 01/29/04
|
 
So you want a return to client-server?
B.O.F.H. | 01/29/04
|
 
i would not
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|

Maybe it's market bifurcation
IT_User | 01/29/04
|
bravo ...browser bad
nograin | 01/29/04
|

however...
nograin | 01/29/04
|
Client/Server?
dlu | 01/29/04
|

It is a story of an old company doing old tricks
serpentmage | 01/29/04
|
X-windows, An entirely new MS Concept
km4hr@... | 01/29/04
|
Ironically, this IS a good thing ...
George Mitchell | 01/29/04
|
Why wait? You can do it today using FLASH
Debunker | 01/30/04
|
the only reason
JWatson77 | 01/30/04
|