P2P companies say they can't filter

TalkBack 11 of 22:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Would

stay away for it. Since this concept says its 'ok' to monitor your information files - a somewhat voyourism styled to RIAAs specification of promotion.

As well the necesity to 'put up roadblocks would be kind of 'getting the baby to the hospital in the case of truly admitting copyrighted files,'can be shared' as a feature of the product itself.

Thus dodging the realistic expectation of those who could stand to benifit on a per value basis - the artists,and authors,producers wich do so,to take a relationship of its aeshetic as its own person. Besides the 'broadcast orienteted product quota market evaluated promotional rationalizm among those members with past recording,public publication specifications.

Nobody should stand to exchange their privacy for such a looser in technilogical expectation as that scenario noted here.

This is 'liberal federalism - think about it.We need the capitol,the product,and the person to remain in effect.Including artists,copyright holders,producers,actors within both music ,and movie conglomerates. This means the persons remain the same.Simply provide the feature for the product you produce.Or can produce. And yeah get paid when you get paid doing so.

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 01/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now
• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now