On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 8:
Next »
« Previous
Won't help
I agree that a law like this is needed to put something on the books paying lip service to helping protect kids from accidentally seeing pornographic content (adult sites are required to have an age disclaimer before you can see inappropriate material). However, I know it won't actually help very much at all.

While it may get some US spammers to comply, not all of them follow the law. Furthermore, most or all foreign ones will thumb their nose at it and just go right on spamming. The FTC has no jurisdiction over those ones, and the only other choices would be diplomatic pressure on their home nations (not likely to help much either), or filtering all Internet traffic coming into the US (a VERY bad idea).

Unfortunately, it's the nature of the beast, and parents will just have to be more diligent at monitoring their kids' Web and e-mail usage.
Posted by: doctormoriarty   Posted on: 01/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

amen  JWatson77 | 01/28/04
Relax  Bobby Sskcat | 01/28/04
Relax  SC-man | 01/29/04
Won't help  doctormoriarty | 01/29/04
LOL... yeah, right.  James T. Kirk | 01/29/04
Well..  d_jedi | 01/29/04
Ha ha ha - sorry, too funny!!!  Wm_Hayashi | 01/29/04
If porno-spammers actually comply...  John L. Ries | 01/29/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here