On BNET: 5 classic computer pranks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 23 of 26:
Next »
« Previous
Take your thinking one step further.
You wrote:
From both a consumer viewpoint and an economic viewpoint, I consider the opening of the operating system to be beneficial. What is the point in having some IBM programmers, some HP programmers, some SGI programmers, some Sun programmers, some Dell (or whoever) programmers all working on solving the same problem? Only one solution will be best (and perhaps not as good as the collaborative solution), and the cost is embedded in all the hardware solutions. Better, in my opinion, they collaborate on the base (like GM, Ford, Toyota sharing standards) and put their talents to use on stuff that sits atop that base...

Okay, you've identified the waste of time and resources: duplicated effort if each company solves the same problem independently. Implicitly, this assumes software which provides functions common to all competitors.

You identify a solution: 'the opening of the operating system'.
If each competitor retained employees working on the problem, their efforts would involve helping a competitor. A company that held something back for its own products would gain an advantage. Successful cooperation is unlikely.

If the open source model is invoked, then the people working on the software would be fired because they'd be replaced by volunteers. This would not make the people who lose their jobs happy. They were better off when efforts were being duplicated.

A third solution is far simpler and less damaging. A separate company develops an operating system that solves the common problems, and charges each of the competitors the same amount. The separate company would be able to hire most if not all the people involved in solving the problems, and they would still receive a salary because sale of a product generates revenues.
In fact, given all that talent, the operating system could be extended to new capabilities, making computers even more desirable and improving the sales of all the competitors for that reason.
The perfect solution, no?


Wish discussion could continue, but I expect this news story to disappear soon. Too bad.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 01/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Holy Understatement, Batman!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 01/28/04
Open Source  nucrash | 01/28/04
OpenOffice was a big hit  JWatson77 | 01/28/04
To paraphrase...  Jose Jimenez | 01/28/04
I might argue that  Chad_z | 01/29/04
They have to report ...can you say ENRON?  nograin | 01/28/04
For personal use-  AbsolutelyNot | 01/28/04
It's too early to make too much out of this  Chad_z | 01/28/04
upgrades are growth because  mvaar | 01/28/04
Fool me once: Shame on you . . . Fool me twice: Shame on me.  Plain Logic | 01/28/04
no its...  doh123 | 01/28/04
Did you read the article?  Anton Philidor | 01/28/04
MyDoom  nite_w0lf | 01/28/04
Had seemed pretty quiet, yes.  Anton Philidor | 01/29/04
Odd point of view...  Rokstar83 | 01/28/04
Believe what they say... and do.  Anton Philidor | 01/29/04
Please..  Patrick Jones | 01/29/04
Restrictions on the damage  Anton Philidor | 01/29/04
Did you read the article?  IT_User | 01/29/04
Shouldn't be necessary...  IT_User | 01/29/04
Okay, that's your view  Anton Philidor | 01/29/04
The way you guys beat on one another  IT_User | 01/29/04
Take your thinking one step further.  Anton Philidor | 01/29/04
Well, it's still there. so let's see how long we can discourse  IT_User | 01/29/04
i think i see another crack in the shell  nite_w0lf | 01/28/04
Wow, sounds like a Sun or IBM release  FilledOut | 01/29/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here