On mySimon: Tom Ford Aviator Sunglasses
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 34:
Next »
« Previous
Looked like a pain to me...
I took a look at Ruby on Rails a few months ago. I got pretty excited about it, especially after seeing the video on their website. Looking deeper into it though, it looked like a major hassle to learn. It wasn't C-style syntax, it was a totally different syntax, like using Scheme or something.

There are two kinds of programmers out there, those who are incredibly specialised in one language, and those who touch a lot of them lightly. I fall into the latter category. The only reason why I can do my job at all, at this point, is because all but one of the languages I use (the odd man out is VB.Net, and I may switch to C# on those projects partially for this reason) C-style syntax. As it is, I have a hard time within the C-style languages keeping them straight. I cannot remember how many times I tried a Perl regex in Java, or tried referencing a JDBC method while working in the .Net Framework, or something similar.

The last thing I need is another language, espcially one with a syntax as different as Ruby's is. Personally, what I want as a developer, is one language or set of languages that work well together, and contain the building blocks for just about everything I can imagine. Microsoft's .Net Framework does that extraordinarily well. It's unfortunate that it's Microsoft only (yeah, I know there's Mono, but I have never, NEVER EVER trusted open source emulations/rewrites of Microsoft's products, for a variety of reasons, but mostly because Microsoft is so reluctant to document the internals of things), because I truly prefer to deplay to *Nix. Oh well, can't win 'em all. But Ruby, no matter how cool or fast it may be, just has no place in my busy day for me to learn it.

J.Ja
Posted by: Justin James   Posted on: 10/31/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I brought this up  Roger Ramjet | 10/31/05
PAPPL?  jpratch | 10/31/05
Its just another trick  Roger Ramjet | 10/31/05
I don't mind, with some reservations  Mark Miller | 10/31/05
Debugging tools for PHP  eheimer | 11/01/05
So what's wrong with Fortran?  Gravitas@... | 10/31/05
Like what?  Not average Joe | 10/31/05
Like handcuffing your code to specific hardware  Robert Kohlenberger | 11/01/05
Right on the Money RK  tbbrickster_z | 11/02/05
Productivity writing assembler?  cgraham_z | 11/03/05
Agree that Database Procedures are Evil  daver_z | 10/31/05
Maybe for small applications  Yensi717 | 10/31/05
OOD  Gravitas@... | 10/31/05
I think  Yensi717 | 10/31/05
Spot on right  Justin James | 10/31/05
Yeah, well...  emofine | 10/31/05
Varying opinions  tero_t_vaananen@... | 11/01/05
Right on.  zztong | 11/01/05
Multiple database vendors  Yensi717 | 11/01/05
Not a pain to edit  Chad_z | 11/01/05
Great framework  bkatz | 10/31/05
Looked like a pain to me...  Justin James | 10/31/05
For Unix deployments you might consider...  Mark Miller | 10/31/05
Message has been deleted.  khakman | 10/31/05
I've heard of Ruby  CobraA1 | 10/31/05
You mean like Smalltalk?  wkharold | 10/31/05
Funny  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 10/31/05
true  jimk_z | 10/31/05
true  jimk_z | 10/31/05
Ruby is OO  tero_t_vaananen@... | 11/01/05
Just what are people spouting about?  jacec | 10/31/05
Are there other benefits?  DougOfCBS ZDNet Moderator | 11/01/05
This is not serious development  SQLDBAJames | 05/29/06
Not everything is a nail  rarsa | 11/03/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here