On TechRepublic: Weirdest error messages of all time
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 45 of 60:
Next »
« Previous
Clearing up Confusion
I stand technically corrected, MSJVM has avaliable with windows installations, however realistically, as you elude to, it was, and has remained, a an old version of the JDK (1.1.4) which was a pre 2000 release.
You wrote:
I'm not certain why Sun demanded having a less than optimal version of java in Windows

I believe Sun did this to make sure that the MS extensions died an early death and did not continue to exists as a rouge package being attached to better implementions of the JDK over several years. But, with a 1.1.4 impl, you might as well not have had anything at all (ok, maybe applets).
You are exactly right about the court case. MS made 'improvements' mainly adding the delegate model to the language, but this was a break in techinical philosophy from what Sun was trying to achieve through it's elaborate interface/listener model. (http://java.sun.com/docs/white/delegates.html)
Some of MS other behaviors, that you express a little more fully (i.e. misrepresentations), I just assume attribute to 'protecting' their interests.

Although, MS promises to assist tranisition of programs requiring MS's extensions to current JVM impls (or, as they also suggest to .NET), I have yet to see any indication that they will be packaging a 3rd party JVM with windows beyond XP (naturally), actually I've seen the opposite.
While perhaps I was overstated in saying that not bundling a current JRE with windows killed consumer 'Desktop'(Web distributed or not) java apps in leu of the many problems with 'using java', I think it is also an overstatement to say that the 'public has always had access to Java through Windows', as really they only had access to 1.1 (basically requiring the user to download a new JRE to run anything more than applets since, say 2001). This is especially important with the coming of J2EE serverside apps as RMI/IIOP was not part of 1.1 (more of an enterprise issue).

So then why is this significant and as you surmise, why is Google positioned to encourge java use?
One, the new wave upon us is OS independent applications. There are many reasons for this, one being the increased stability and ease of use of linux is begining to make it a viable OS option (and certainly less expensive), another simply being backwards compatability for many businesses(i.e. cost of upgrading every couple of years).
Two, couple interoperability with a new distribution and licensing model. Web-based allow for smaller footprints, easier updates, more choices and most importantly, no dependency that the software has to be installed on a particular machine (i.e. my applications, or more correctly my destop follows me like online email!).
Which also leads to licensing. The old model, you pay for it whether you use it never or everyday (look at Windows Corporate OS licensing model to see a gross example of this, as you must pay a licensing fee for each computer your company has reguardless if it has Windows on it or not). The new licensing will be more pay on demand.

Because Google wants to become your online desktop, for those of us that don't want to use Jump Linux!, the platform they support for their backend services and their thicker 'desktop' clients becomes very important!
They could have just as well picked .NET, but MS has their own initiative with MSN that is essetially the same idea with .NET.

This is the begining of the battle for the online desktop, and this partnership assures it will be a good one.
Posted by: JonnyBlade   Posted on: 10/06/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I was blown out of my chair...  vdraken | 10/04/05
re:I was blown out of my chair...  Edward@... | 10/04/05
That's the Way I LIKE It (nt)  tbbrickster_z | 10/04/05
The only thing that could make this better  Loverock Davidson | 10/04/05
Oh and don't forget  Loverock Davidson | 10/04/05
and...  Arm A. Geddon | 10/04/05
5th story?  Arm A. Geddon | 10/04/05
Well, Microsoft sure hates all the comotion. Their stock already droped 3%.  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
End of day: GOOG down more than MSFT  java.user | 10/04/05
Well, in any case, the war has begun, the interesting thing is the swings.  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
Re: "GOOG down more than MSFT"  metilley@... | 10/04/05
Schmidt too!  java.user | 10/04/05
They probably do  Loverock Davidson | 10/04/05
Better yet...  Still Lynn | 10/04/05
Mo' Better for Experienced and NOOBs  tbbrickster_z | 10/04/05
What is Deal with the M$ Sun Broad Cooperation Agreement  IceTheNet@... | 10/04/05
Distributed Applications- what about the Ent?  mrmmills_z | 10/04/05
Google and the Enterprise  Erik1234 | 10/04/05
Keep thinking  Still Lynn | 10/04/05
Engterprise Google--check this  frabjous | 10/04/05
AJAX, Firefox, and Greasemonkey  rapt0r | 10/04/05
Did you notice that Microsoft dropped 3% on this news.  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
Hahhaa, repeating the same lies? MSFT only down 2%  java.user | 10/04/05
Well, Microsoft was down over 3% for a while, and both Sun and Google were  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
Not quite accurate...  dsentman@... | 10/05/05
What you saw here is just the tip of the iceberg.  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
The two approches Microsoft vs Google  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
Awesome  java.user | 10/04/05
Full disclosure: I own Sun stock. But, no Google stock.  DonnieBoy | 10/04/05
Agree  java.user | 10/04/05
Until someone else can afford Google-size server farms  daver_z | 10/05/05
I have an idea. Make the internet a commodity  OldTimer1 | 10/05/05
Wooho  Esmiles | 10/04/05
SUN has the weapon against WINTEL  sharikou | 10/04/05
PROGRAMMERS not AJAX  CWButler | 10/04/05
How Google saved Sun  enternamehere-20061413043042855708329691381958 | 10/04/05
Re: "How Google saved Sun..."  metilley@... | 10/04/05
The toolbar that changed the world.  Anton Philidor | 10/04/05
Remind me again...  dsentman@... | 10/05/05
More than just a toolbar ....  whisperycat | 10/05/05
Action!  Anton Philidor | 10/05/05
Beyond OpenOffice  muddybok | 10/06/05
Here's the Point ....  JonnyBlade | 10/05/05
Correcting some java history.  Anton Philidor | 10/05/05
Clearing up Confusion  JonnyBlade | 10/06/05
It's the OpenOffice  alphasun | 10/05/05
No, OpenOffice is not a thin client app  daver_z | 10/05/05
All sizzle and no steak.  Roger Ramjet | 10/05/05
Non-News  blackshole | 10/05/05
I told you!  daver_z | 10/05/05
But who told you?  Anton Philidor | 10/05/05
Perversion of JRE!  deepee912 | 10/05/05
No, the toolbar is spyware, not a spam engine.  Anton Philidor | 10/05/05
I dumped My Google search on Firefox  OldTimer1 | 10/05/05
A GOOGLE of a mistake  Jazhawk | 10/05/05
Next week Microsoft and Google announce a partnership  Boot_Agnostic | 10/05/05
No Thank-you to Sun and Google  jpr75_z | 10/06/05
Only 100 MB for Sun's Java?  Anton Philidor | 10/06/05
Only 25MB for .NET?  JonnyBlade | 10/06/05
WHAT!!! No Comment from Cox and M$ Rep!!!  tbbrickster_z | 10/06/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and