On TV.com: MEGAN FOX Photos
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 82:
Next »
« Previous
So much for open standards...
Gee, I never could have predicted that MS would
pull a stunt like this. Oh wait! I did. MS is
not interested in open standards of any kind.
MS is only interested in intense vendor lockin.

I wouldn't have it any other way though. Don't
pull any punches now MS. You had better fight
for your life.

-Bryan
Posted by: prime21   Posted on: 01/23/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Holy XML Batman  FilledOut | 01/23/04
Nail, coffin  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
Nail, coffin  NoB$ | 01/23/04
Itll be a competition  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
Why not a Linux shill????  vferrara | 01/23/04
But where's the funding?  tic swayback | 01/23/04
But where's the funding?  nrlz | 01/24/04
This is a stupid thread  Martin Marvinski | 01/24/04
Linus?  ryusen | 01/23/04
2 words: George Soros  Art Jones2 | 01/26/04
change laws  stephen732@... | 01/23/04
Can't you guys see this is a facetious post  vferrara | 01/26/04
Not Linus, more like IBM, HP, AOL,  FilledOut | 01/24/04
It wont fly  OhMyGosh | 01/23/04
it's not XML...  in-DUH-vidual | 01/23/04
silly rabit  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
I'm confused...  jesusgeek | 01/23/04
Not so easy in Europe  FirstNLastN | 01/23/04
What are the visiting hours on my documents?  Nigel Johnstone | 01/23/04
Yes, this is just one more way to enrage customers.  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Remember Office 97?  issthatso | 01/23/04
Remember it?  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/23/04
M$'s attempt to further proprietize Office is already doomed to failure.  dicktaurus@... | 01/23/04
So much for open standards...  prime21 | 01/23/04
Right! Mico$oft NEVER means OPEN standards! (NT)  dicktaurus@... | 01/23/04
Software patents are bad!!!  vferrara | 01/23/04
I must agree  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
Maybe not  voska | 01/23/04
OK John Carroll...  Cardinal_Bill | 01/23/04
LOL - they have heads in sand somewhere  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
Patend Technology Not Data Formats  michael-t | 01/23/04
Er... anybody read the patents?  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Can you hear me now???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/23/04
Loud and Clear  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
don't take it too seriously...  ryusen | 01/23/04
Nope  voska | 01/23/04
Read the Patents - not the poor reporting  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
You and Bruce Perens seem to agree  tic swayback | 01/23/04
don't say things like that....  ryusen | 01/23/04
Who do you think told Perens??? grin  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/23/04
If they're so cheap, how will it lock them out?  tic swayback | 01/23/04
you were told it would be cheap  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
If you don't use office what does it matter?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/24/04
I guess unlike you, I care about people  JWatson77 | 01/24/04
Save the insults for your family members.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/25/04
Here's one for you...  Patrick Jones | 01/26/04
To Patrick...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
It's the content of the license.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/24/04
Bundling proprietary with OSS  tic swayback | 01/24/04
Once again, I agree with Bit. Neat!  Damon K | 01/23/04
Microsoft trying to show how stupid they are????  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Easy, it's just a patent...  IT_User | 01/23/04
Who said anything about patenting a data format?  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
You have got to be kidding  serpentmage | 01/23/04
Finally - someone took the time to read the patent...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Next up, the GNU Public Patent.  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Already sort of have that.  Robert Crocker | 01/24/04
A patent is merely that.  IT_User | 01/23/04
two statements from MS:  ryusen | 01/23/04
Go read the patent...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Next up, the GNU Public Patent.  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Different topic, same old strategy.  chiishen | 01/23/04
Read the patent  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Oh  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/23/04
Patent this!  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/23/04
Okay, that does it, I'm patenting something!  el1jones | 01/23/04
patent this  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
I can't think of a better reason . . .  James Dean_z | 01/23/04
gee - didn't see this coming did we  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
Didn't see what?  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
OpenOffice getting to good to compete on quality  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
An MS user ready to evaluate the switch.  jimk_z | 01/23/04
Shareholders...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Corel (Corehell), Lotus Smartsuite, MS Ofc all doOmed  FilledOut | 01/24/04
COUGH... COUGH...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
COUGH... COUGH...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Wheeze Wheeze . . .  FilledOut | 01/25/04
Er nope  Sam_Lowry | 01/25/04
Ern ope  FilledOut | 01/27/04
MS: Office will use XML and will be open as long as it is convenient  George Jay | 01/24/04
They will come out with some fromat that makes the world have to upgrade.  boatelc | 01/24/04
You know...  BitTwiddler | 01/24/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

IT Solutions for 2010

  • Get cost-effective strategies and roadmaps on the most important issues facing IT leaders in 2010! Learn how to easily cut costs and deliver greater efficiency starting with your database, IT compliance management and data center. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard. Visit the IT Leaders Dashboard.
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline