On last.fm: Who's your favorite band?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 42:
Next »
« Previous
STUPID
What you havecompletely forgotten in your "analysis" is that the Ajax engine is not meant to be loaded from the Ajax website you're visiting. Instead it is meant to be embedded in the browser, and secured with it.

The website will then only interact with it by sending small XML data that the embedded Ajax engine will process and render itself.

This means that an Ajax engine should be embedded directly in mobile devices. No more need for web sites to create the layout. The Ajax engine will render the website the waythat the user wants it, and the engine will only load the contents that it knows it can render.

This means BETTER usability of websites.

And because you use insulting rough words in your replies, I'll use a rough term to describe your attitude here: STUPID.

Go and play in your home garden, and forget the web, you have simply not understood anything. I even wonder why you are interacting here in the ZDNet website that hosts lots of Javascripts, and cookies... What are you doing here?
Posted by: PhilippeV   Posted on: 11/30/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Doesn't it feel like 1999 again?  toomuchgreeatea@... | 10/03/05
OOH... Another email client  jmills@... | 10/03/05
AJAX gives software a fresh look  Loverock Davidson | 10/03/05
AJAX Rocks  Chad_z | 10/03/05
I agree that AJAX rocks, but we need to be working on something more.  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
Agreed  Chad_z | 10/03/05
Dent in MSFT's kingdom?  IT Scion | 10/03/05
AJAX is good, but it is NOT enough. We need better interactivity.  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
THEY ARE open standards  sulphuricacid | 01/22/07
Only time will tell  CobraA1 | 10/03/05
AJAX is only for the next 5 years. It may hit a peak in 2 years or less.  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
Mozilla + SWT?  schiller_z | 10/03/05
Yes, Java is good, but we also need something more light weight, AND  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
We already have all this, its called FLASH MX  wildranger | 10/03/05
Something more lightweight  CobraA1 | 10/04/05
AJAX will give Javascript a new life  FADS_z | 10/03/05
Ajax!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 10/03/05
Old News  grincity2003 | 10/03/05
web base  curio@... | 10/03/05
Even Broadband isn't broad enough.  daver_z | 10/03/05
AJAX IS EVIL!!! ...Dont use it!  wildranger | 10/03/05
Yes... and no  Fred Fredrickson | 10/03/05
Nope, You are wrong.....AJAX IS STILL EVIL! WHY?  wildranger | 10/05/05
Sorry, still not convinced  dbm@... | 10/31/05
STUPID  PhilippeV | 11/30/05
For the most part....AMEN!(nt)  IT Scion | 10/04/05
Complete misunderstanding  PhilippeV | 11/30/05
Forget Web 2.0 then  isamuelson@... | 02/27/06
AJAX 2.0  LogicallyGenius | 10/03/05
more loaded words and slogans  jimk_z | 10/04/05
My prediction: It will be replaced quickly  CobraA1 | 10/04/05
XAML may be the replacement  Mark Miller | 10/04/05
If XAML gains popularity  CobraA1 | 10/04/05
AJAX -vs- Actionscript  tom@... | 10/04/05
If I want to swing that way ...  toomuchgreeatea@... | 10/04/05
Yep, AJAX sucks, and is useless...try Flash MX  wildranger | 10/05/05
You can actually compare flash e-mail to AJAX e-mail  po_opik1 | 10/17/05
AJAX?  Brakiss | 02/06/06
If AJAX can't clean Browser Sink, what will?  basudeb@... | 10/19/05
Context  Gravitas@... | 11/30/05
Ajax, Win XP and Vista  jbaviera@... | 03/02/06
Forgot something  jbaviera@... | 03/02/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here