On mySimon: Caddyshack Trivia Game
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 42:
Next »
« Previous
AJAX is good, but it is NOT enough. We need better interactivity.
Google should be working with Mozilla, Sun, and others to create an open solution that will allow for more interactivity, fast graphics, cached applications and ofline usage, sharing files between providers, etc. Of course privacy and security are extremely important here.

Really this is what Microsoft is working on for Longhorn (Vista). They are hoping you will use proprietary protocols and apis to create rich web applications without even realizing it. Then, the applications will not work with out Windows on the server and the client. They will back port these apis and tools to XP, but NOT Win2000 or Win98.

Google would be smart to isolate Microsoft with open standards, and cross platform cababilities, and also the ability to run on legace Windows. But, Google can not go it alone.
Posted by: DonnieBoy   Posted on: 10/03/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Doesn't it feel like 1999 again?  toomuchgreeatea@... | 10/03/05
OOH... Another email client  jmills@... | 10/03/05
AJAX gives software a fresh look  Loverock Davidson | 10/03/05
AJAX Rocks  Chad_z | 10/03/05
I agree that AJAX rocks, but we need to be working on something more.  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
Agreed  Chad_z | 10/03/05
Dent in MSFT's kingdom?  IT Scion | 10/03/05
AJAX is good, but it is NOT enough. We need better interactivity.  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
THEY ARE open standards  sulphuricacid | 01/22/07
Only time will tell  CobraA1 | 10/03/05
AJAX is only for the next 5 years. It may hit a peak in 2 years or less.  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
Mozilla + SWT?  schiller_z | 10/03/05
Yes, Java is good, but we also need something more light weight, AND  DonnieBoy | 10/03/05
We already have all this, its called FLASH MX  wildranger | 10/03/05
Something more lightweight  CobraA1 | 10/04/05
AJAX will give Javascript a new life  FADS_z | 10/03/05
Ajax!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 10/03/05
Old News  grincity2003 | 10/03/05
web base  curio@... | 10/03/05
Even Broadband isn't broad enough.  daver_z | 10/03/05
AJAX IS EVIL!!! ...Dont use it!  wildranger | 10/03/05
Yes... and no  Fred Fredrickson | 10/03/05
Nope, You are wrong.....AJAX IS STILL EVIL! WHY?  wildranger | 10/05/05
Sorry, still not convinced  dbm@... | 10/31/05
STUPID  PhilippeV | 11/30/05
For the most part....AMEN!(nt)  IT Scion | 10/04/05
Complete misunderstanding  PhilippeV | 11/30/05
Forget Web 2.0 then  isamuelson@... | 02/27/06
AJAX 2.0  LogicallyGenius | 10/03/05
more loaded words and slogans  jimk_z | 10/04/05
My prediction: It will be replaced quickly  CobraA1 | 10/04/05
XAML may be the replacement  Mark Miller | 10/04/05
If XAML gains popularity  CobraA1 | 10/04/05
AJAX -vs- Actionscript  tom@... | 10/04/05
If I want to swing that way ...  toomuchgreeatea@... | 10/04/05
Yep, AJAX sucks, and is useless...try Flash MX  wildranger | 10/05/05
You can actually compare flash e-mail to AJAX e-mail  po_opik1 | 10/17/05
AJAX?  Brakiss | 02/06/06
If AJAX can't clean Browser Sink, what will?  basudeb@... | 10/19/05
Context  Gravitas@... | 11/30/05
Ajax, Win XP and Vista  jbaviera@... | 03/02/06
Forgot something  jbaviera@... | 03/02/06

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement