On CBS.com: Share YOUR travel photos at Amazing Race
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 43 of 61:
Next »
« Previous
Comment at odds w/ MS lawyer
/* Signing up for the shared source program doesn't pose problems for open-source programmers, according to Taylor. Participating in a shared source project "in no way contaminates yourself or any programs you're working on," he said.

*/

I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers O'Reilly's Open Source Convention (http://technetcast.ddj.com/tnc_catalog.html?item_id=267 first two links), which had Tiemann (from Red Hat) and Ballmer (Microsoft) head-to-head on stage.

What I remember most was the Ballmer brought David Stutz with him. Stutz identified himself as a Microsoft lawyer. Near the end of the debate, during the question phase, Tiemann rejected Shared Source licensing because, as he put it, "if I look at the code I'm infected."

If there was ever a time for Ballmer or Stutz to dispel this belief, especially since it had been popular in Linux programmers for months, it was then. Instead both looked like they'd been caught with their hands in the cookie jar. Stutz, who had been talking about "derivative works" and how he'd "tried cases that were based on abstractions on top of abstractions" in particular shrugged, as if to say "yup."

It's pretty clear that if you read MS code, you will be tainted in any related programming work.

For further clarification, look at SCO's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel (sco.tuxrocks.com/Docs/IBM/Doc-67.pdf), interrogatory 4, pg. 11: Identify all persons who had *access* to UNIX source code, AIX source code and Dynix source code.... For each such person, set forth precisely the materials to which he or she had access.

UNIX, in this case is SCO, AIX is IBM, and Dynix is Sequent, now owned by IBM. Note that the question regards simple access, such as the ability to read. Depending on the details, SCO's legal team seems to think that such access infects programmers.
Posted by: mlybbert   Posted on: 01/23/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

This is it, my borthers!  SloooeShflu | 01/22/04
Translation Please  Don Bradley | 01/22/04
You're not kewl enough to hang with us on planet Borther  SloooeShflu | 01/22/04
Borthian exploration  CaptainObvious | 01/22/04
Don't leave me behind  X41 | 01/23/04
Ummm...  Confused by religion | 01/22/04
Big deal...you don't think there's any book cooking???  SloooeShflu | 01/23/04
Borthers? What's a 'borther?'  Damon K | 01/23/04
Huh?  rapson | 01/22/04
Just need to have a program  FilledOut | 01/22/04
Simple Answer for you  voska | 01/22/04
Sorry, but  hal9000mx | 01/22/04
Assuming they want to compete  voska | 01/22/04
They should make it multiplatform, but...  Michael Kelly | 01/22/04
They have office for MACs  jpfitz@... | 01/27/04
3rd parties..  ITGuy04 | 01/22/04
What a lovely idea... but this is the real world  Michael Kelly | 01/22/04
Good Software Writers...  ITGuy04 | 01/23/04
it's not the platform...  ryusen | 01/23/04
Good Software Writers... in a hard real world  forozco@... | 01/23/04
Simple Response for you  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 01/22/04
Interesting accidental point  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/23/04
Concur  Chad_z | 01/22/04
Why would anyone use IIS when Apache is available?  NemesisNL | 01/22/04
You wouldn't.  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/22/04
Well, he showed up. That's good.  FilledOut | 01/22/04
IIS, IE, Word on Linux  mbraincell@... | 01/22/04
Cuz MS has good apps, but yucky OS  zen_dogen | 01/22/04
Their apps suck too  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 01/22/04
Huh?  LightningShrike | 01/22/04
apparently, many do not share your opinion  pschroeder@... | 01/23/04
where'd that come from?  LightningShrike | 01/22/04
why don't we all just give up?  nograin | 01/23/04
Hmmm. Good point.  John Zern | 01/23/04
MS Apps for Linux - Maybe not!  RexBallard | 01/23/04
No IIS and IE Ports to Linux, Please  dlu | 01/22/04
Nonsense  michael-t | 01/22/04
BS (said politely!)  marksashton | 01/22/04
No  LightningShrike | 01/22/04
many apps  ryusen | 01/23/04
Ooh I want MS Software  t8 | 01/22/04
The ownership is on the community??  Robert Carnegie | 01/23/04
Comment at odds w/ MS lawyer  mlybbert | 01/23/04
Linux VS Microsoft  BillGates_z | 01/23/04
100% MS Free  halmin | 01/23/04
hmmm  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
Time to trust  Don Bradley | 01/23/04
just a thought  Arrg | 01/23/04
they are  nograin | 01/23/04
Let us be fair to users  amitieljusa | 01/23/04
Mars Rover using Linux?  John Zern | 01/23/04
Tell NASA..  Don Bradley | 01/23/04
Odds are it's using Windoze....  supoman | 01/23/04
Actually, it's running JAVA  pschroeder@... | 01/23/04
Mars Rover running Java  d_jedi | 01/23/04
Paronoid M$  beafeater | 01/23/04
Justified Paranoia  RexBallard | 01/23/04
windows obselete?  ryusen | 01/23/04
Longhorn = BSD?  RexBallard | 01/23/04
anti-trust  ryusen | 01/26/04
Better than Last year.  RexBallard | 01/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More