On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 31 of 109:
Next »
« Previous
Proof.
--> "You can't say that there are no WMD, they haven't been found, but how does that prove they don't exist?"

(1) That is not the issue. The WMD needed to be have been found in order for there to be a valid reason for that Iraq fiasco, per what Bush stated publicly no less! Remember "innocent until proven guilty?"

(2) Bush has personal motive for waging war in Iraq, namely the oil that is there.

(3) There is an even more covert and satanic motive for waging war in Iraq beyond the oil that Bush wants, namely bringing Iraq's money system into the global "money" fraud. Read all about Iraq's new "money" fraud at http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/07/international/worldspecial/07CND-BAGH.html?ex=1058846400&en=934111292497d3f7&ei=5004&partner=UNTD and read all about the U.S. "money" fraud and its consequences at http://home.absolute.net/xode/nwofraud/Bankruptcy_Fraud/Bankfraud1.htm



--> "I think most reasonable people would agree that sodamn insane certainly did use WMD on his own people, so he DID posses them at one time. Are you so naive to believe that he just got rid of them?"

This statement reminds me of lemmings trading their (and everyone else's) freedom for perceived security (that doesn't exist) with the result that they lose both. This is not at all "reasonable."

--> "It may not be apparent to you, but Bush is one of the most honest, sincere Presidents we have had in a long time (at least in the last 12 years)"

Based on the above statements that I made, this is pure nonsense.
Posted by: xode@...   Posted on: 01/21/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The plot thickens  vferrara | 01/20/04
Yeah, BTW who's picking up the tab this time?  IT_User | 01/20/04
as for the linux users hanging in the balance  NemesisNL | 01/20/04
There's less to this than meets the eye  IT_User | 01/21/04
Sorry. The URL  IT_User | 01/21/04
It's called FUD  MacGeek2121 | 01/21/04
Sorry about the typos  MacGeek2121 | 01/21/04
Well whaddaya know?  IT_User | 01/21/04
it was not just hot air  dg mh | 01/20/04
It is hard to believe...  rapson | 01/20/04
I'm with you, I think  IT_User | 01/20/04
I have an analogy that may help...  Pebkac Charlie | 01/21/04
WMD  voska | 01/21/04
WMD2  KTLA | 01/21/04
I knew there were some here...  Spoon Jabber | 01/21/04
WMD found in the USA  stephen732@... | 01/22/04
Nope, it's the woman who lied about winning the lottery.  Steve Summers | 01/20/04
And I think...  BitTwiddler | 01/20/04
You don't think this is high dollar FUD?  MacGeek2121 | 01/21/04
They must have a case  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/20/04
"Even a President wouldn't stand there ... and lie" ?!? NO EVIDENCE=NO CASE  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
Proof?  Spoon Jabber | 01/20/04
Simple: Gub'mint lied thru its butt immediately after 9/11  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
Again, no proof.  Spoon Jabber | 01/21/04
May as well give it up  doctormoriarty | 01/21/04
(NT)Thanks Doc, can't say I didn't try.  Spoon Jabber | 01/21/04
This is a joke, right?  NoB$ | 01/21/04
Your funny  Spoon Jabber | 01/21/04
Take this elsewhere please  Pebkac Charlie | 01/21/04
something funny i heard..  ryusen | 01/21/04
Proof.  xode@... | 01/21/04
I would disagree about Saint Bush  MacGeek2121 | 01/21/04
victim...  ryusen | 01/21/04
(NT) Eggs was being ever-so-slightly sarcastic... :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/21/04
Which was eveident ...  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/21/04
Must have had my sarcasti-meter turned off. Duh!  dicktaurus@... | 01/21/04
may be... or may be not?  Solid Water | 01/20/04
Who benefits from this?  vferrara | 01/20/04
We do.  notbilln | 01/20/04
Actually, some think the FUD backfired, giving Linux useful exposure  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
Who Benefits from this?  KE4MA | 01/21/04
Will be interesting to see Novell's claims  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
I tend to agree...  John Le'Brecage | 01/20/04
Royalty tends to dispute SCO's position  dscherf | 01/20/04
Very good point.  John Le'Brecage | 01/20/04
Can't locate it right now  dscherf | 01/20/04
well here they are  schmitt249 | 01/20/04
I read it differently  toadlife | 01/20/04
Read it again  Teran | 01/21/04
No, you need to read it again  toadlife | 01/21/04
Not necessarily  dscherf | 01/21/04
I wont argue that, but...  toadlife | 01/21/04
RE: - No, you need to read it again  cammobus@... | 02/10/04
Will be interesting to see them ruled on  FamilyManFirst | 01/20/04
that's easy  dg mh | 01/21/04
on the contrary  avdp | 01/20/04
MS shills agree  NoB$ | 01/21/04
Oh, I don't know what you think you've seen...  rbethell | 01/21/04
Yup, that's one side certainly..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/21/04
"Great number"  rbethell | 01/22/04
Private Conversation between Stallman and Torvalds  MuffinMan_z | 01/20/04
confidential?  ONEstar | 01/20/04
Pretty lame, dude.  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
I'm referring to MM, not Onestar, sorry!  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
Funny... but...  doe_z | 01/20/04
Like all muffins, methinks this one is half baked...  KSchaefer | 01/21/04
The SCO attack is way too serious for humor like this...  xode@... | 01/21/04
give and take...  Iko_z | 01/21/04
What a Troll...  msdead | 01/22/04
Details  ONEstar | 01/20/04
what a surprise  NoB$ | 01/20/04
what a minute...  ryusen | 01/20/04
Exactly Right  gilgamesh_z | 01/20/04
read carefully  Iko_z | 01/21/04
Careful now...  Pebkac Charlie | 01/21/04
But this suit does nothing of the sort  IT_User | 01/21/04
I'm suprized . . .that it took so long  zijiang | 01/20/04
The timing doesn't surprise me  tntoak | 01/22/04
Every Linux user should counter sue SCO for Slander and Blackmail !!!  Plain Logic | 01/20/04
There are no lawful courts in this country.  xode@... | 01/21/04
Sorry guys, I think SCO is WRONG!!  rmkjr@... | 01/20/04
Well it just seems  Err Nope | 01/20/04
SCO is being paid to do this  copygod74 | 01/20/04
Increasingly, that seems to be the case...  dicktaurus@... | 01/20/04
The evil hand of M$ reaches far...  xunil skcor | 01/21/04
The partner wouldn't Microsoft  MacGeek2121 | 01/21/04
Yes, by IBM, Sun, HP, SGI, etc..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/21/04
Eh?  rbethell | 01/21/04
Yup! IBM pays a license to SCO  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/21/04
which in turn goes to Novell  ryusen | 01/22/04
More Serutan  IT_User | 01/21/04
Even if they win...  BitTwiddler | 01/20/04
It;s the great "Which will be better" test...  KSchaefer | 01/21/04
Huh?  BitTwiddler | 01/21/04
best laugh I've had all day  Arrg | 01/21/04
NEWS FLASH  Bill4 | 01/21/04
FOLLOW UP NEWS  Bill4 | 01/21/04
It's a FUD machine  MacGeek2121 | 01/21/04
SCO: It's OK for US to make unproven claims, but not anyone else.  James T. Kirk | 01/21/04
FUELED By MICROSOFT'S DIRTY DEEDS  brenthawkinsmd | 01/21/04
Prove it or stop gum flapping!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/21/04
Whats the deal SCO?  spinit | 01/21/04
SCO has legal problems in the US, Europe, Asia and Australia  B.O.F.H. | 01/21/04
What a convoluted contract!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/21/04
Re: What a convoluted contract!  jfalknor | 01/22/04
Newsflash: Mike Cox sues Microsoft  Knorthern Knight | 01/21/04
Proof positive  toadlife | 01/21/04
Unix is a failed business model from the beginning  George Mitchell | 01/21/04
SCO now wants a legislative 'solution'  George Mitchell | 01/22/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More