On CHOW: Why do onions make you cry?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 53:
Next »
« Previous
More like, they push because they thought they had to ...
/* they push, because they have to...

if they don't attempt to defend their trademark they lose it...
*/

You're right that MS is responsible for protecting its trademarks, as any trademark holder is. However, it only needs to defend against trademark dillution, not against personal names. MS runs a big ship, and simply didn't look into the issue before paying the legal guns.

/* they atleast need to show that they are attemptign to defend their trademark. as long as they don't use legal/fnancial pressure to force anythign on him, i see no bullying.
*/

Look at http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/34955.html for a few details of some legal pressure MS has used.

For those to lazy to click, here's an exerpt:

/* "They responded to this email by offering to give me all of my out-of-pocket expenses in return for the domain name. This came out to be $10; the amount I paid for the domain. This made me feel insulted. I had spent a lot of time building up my site and I had only been offered $10 for my work. I responded by asking for $10,000, which I regret doing now, for my work and domain name."

As he now knows, Mike had unwittingly slipped into the classic trap set by companies in order to get hold of domain names .... By offering to sell the domain for profit (even if sparked by the offer of payment by the other party), according to the bent logic of domain dispute arbitrators, it shows the owner had no legitimate interest in the domain and so it should be handed over.

Microsoft, with its case bolstered, declined and Mike heard no more until 14 January when a 25-page letter and book were Fed-Ex?ed to his house explaining why he would have to hand over the domain, ...
*/

Twenty-five page letter (written by a law firm, BTW) and a book. Looks like legal pressuring here.
Posted by: mlybbert   Posted on: 01/21/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Amazing, this passes for "news".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
Hey it's big new in Canada  George Jay | 01/20/04
they push, because they have to...  ryusen | 01/20/04
More like, they push because they thought they had to ...  mlybbert | 01/21/04
thanks for the info...  ryusen | 01/21/04
It has the same "news" legitimacy as all the Longhorn adverts  SloooeShflu | 01/20/04
Two so far, anyone else?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
Umm..THREE! You forgot yourself...  SloooeShflu | 01/20/04
Well it seems...  IT_User | 01/20/04
Amazing, this passes for "news".  NoB$ | 01/20/04
Sounds like a market problem to me.  John Le'Brecage | 01/20/04
When Microsoft does something sooo stupid, yes, it is big news.  DonnieBoy | 01/20/04
How is Microsoft doing something stupid even REMOTELY news?  pschroeder@... | 01/20/04
RANT RANT RANT  voska | 01/20/04
best rant ever!  pschroeder@... | 01/20/04
It is news!  JWatson77 | 01/20/04
well...  pschroeder@... | 01/20/04
When a large corporation can...  BitTwiddler | 01/20/04
You can be prevented from using your own name  vferrara | 01/20/04
Well put  IT_User | 01/20/04
I've McDonald's Steak House once on road trip  voska | 01/20/04
Degree of phonetic similarity  Michel Merlin | 01/22/04
What A RipOff  MuffinMan_z | 01/20/04
Turn yourself in  jasonp@... | 01/20/04
watchout - screen names may be next  JWatson77 | 01/20/04
Don't know about Canada...  rtkeeling@... | 01/20/04
or veronica  Hanover Phist | 01/20/04
Whoa!!!  Ployd_Farker | 01/20/04
You are totally correct ...  coffeenite | 01/20/04
hey  JWatson77 | 01/20/04
standard argument  pschroeder@... | 01/20/04
Re: What A RipOff  calewilliam | 01/20/04
Again, Microsoft not thinking. How about dropping the Lindows thing too?  DonnieBoy | 01/20/04
See my previous post...  rtkeeling@... | 01/20/04
Another Reason Never To Buy Microsoft  brenthawkinsmd | 01/20/04
Criminal?  vferrara | 01/20/04
Can you say Fedora???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
We all can. Your point was?...  SloooeShflu | 01/20/04
Perhaps if you read...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/20/04
Get to the point already...  el1jones | 01/20/04
There is a dispute  IT_User | 01/20/04
RE: There is a dispute  gigglypuff | 01/20/04
Hey, don't pick on me!  IT_User | 01/20/04
Nice try Ax  RedHat9User | 01/20/04
At least they reconsidered  Chad_z | 01/20/04
Now onto SonMikeRowe.com  FilledOut | 01/20/04
Anyone remember the Nissan case?  pschroeder@... | 01/20/04
Mike Rowe is his name.  copygod74 | 01/20/04
and "Mike Rowe Soft" is NOT his name  Michel Merlin | 01/20/04
Two faced Microsoft  jellyclock | 01/21/04
what?  pschroeder@... | 01/21/04
Is full of Buffalo Bagels  Squawkbox | 01/21/04
The law, it's a funny thing when conveyed on sentiment.  ldouglas | 01/21/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here