On CBS MoneyWatch: How much sleep do you really need?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 8:
Next »
« Previous
Even if they try, I think this opposes to the ever lasting motto of M$....
A system that can "deliver" everything the user needs, specially when they (MS) will be forced to say that they're NOW able to accomodate other systems they even have tried to bury or kill. I don't think that our new "newbies" in the virtulization arena will think this was an original invention or even convenient for serious deployment in formal IT environments. What's next? A Windows that supports other Windows within in case (it's not IF is WHEN) it crashes??? Funny huh! I'm sticking with GNU and real decendants of +NIX technology, I've no plans to live forever and I need to PRODUCE solutions TODAY!
Posted by: MrGrave   Posted on: 10/10/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Awesome decision...  Mike Cox | 08/24/05
awwwsum  mujadaddy | 08/24/05
I still can't believe that M$ users haven't realize...  MrGrave | 10/10/05
They cannot even build a 1/2-way decent  michael_t | 08/24/05
Even if they try, I think this opposes to the ever lasting motto of M$....  MrGrave | 10/10/05
Mainframe VM in 1970's, UNIX in 1990's, MS VM in 2006 ???  Plain Logic | 08/24/05
Yep, my favourite personal soap opera...  MrGrave | 10/10/05
Pay, pay pay  Roger Ramjet | 08/25/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here