On last.fm: Find concerts in your area
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 44:
Next »
« Previous
Hostile takeovers by the United Way?
(For those unfamiliar, the United Way gathers funds for charitable organizations.)

You wrote:
What you describe is capitolism, nothing wrong with it. If you can get your product cheaper but it puts another out of work that's the way the ball bounces.

What we're talking about is unpaid labor intended to undercut paid labor. This is not capitalism; it's a hostile act.
The main use of volunteer labor is for the benefit of charities, but if a normal charity advertised its goal as removing people from paid jobs, do you think volunteers would surge through the doors?


You also wrote:
But where one job is lost due to a proprietary software company not being able to compete another job is created in the in house developement of the open source software to make it work for the business in question.

When you write that, you're implying that open source software requires more staff than proprietary software to do the same job. Otherwise the move from proprietary to free open source wouldn't require hiring. Very few additional hires would be needed to make the change from proprietary software a loser, particularly if the jobs require exceptional skills. Also, management prefers buying products to hiring staff, as you've probably noticed.

In short, if your argument were correct, free open source software would rarely be selected, and, if it were used, management might easily decide to replace it with outsourcing, offshoring, or Microsoft products.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 01/15/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Strategic mistake  Mike Cox | 01/15/04
Interview technique  Chris Moller | 01/15/04
*APPLAUSE*  Robert Crocker | 01/15/04
job interview???  rflink | 01/15/04
In these trying time..  Mike Cox | 01/15/04
...united we stand!  dg mh | 01/15/04
What? No Chinese water torture?  AbsolutelyNot | 01/15/04
Mike, your posts are becoming monotonous...  emartin_z | 01/15/04
Where are they?  mbratch | 01/15/04
hhmm and they say you can't make money  Arrg | 01/15/04
You can't  Anton Philidor | 01/15/04
Ohh please  NemesisNL | 01/15/04
If wishing made it so...  Anton Philidor | 01/15/04
Just the nature of business  voska | 01/15/04
Hostile takeovers by the United Way?  Anton Philidor | 01/15/04
No he's not  NemesisNL | 01/16/04
someone's still got to write the code...  ryusen | 01/15/04
You can't?  Chris Moller | 01/15/04
Water is also free  Iain_Peters | 01/15/04
Or fire IT staff to afford MS tax  NoB$ | 01/15/04
I can see that  AbsolutelyNot | 01/15/04
Wrong!!  emartin_z | 01/15/04
Oh, you mean...  Yen_z | 01/15/04
I disagree  Arrg | 01/16/04
Cool...  John Carroll ZDNet Moderator | 01/15/04
Sigh  NemesisNL | 01/15/04
Non was on personal PC's  JWatson77 | 01/15/04
Good points John  Tim Patterson | 01/15/04
Who cares if it they sold Open Source software  voska | 01/15/04
How HP IS making money off of GPL software  George Mitchell | 01/15/04
In the same vein  AbsolutelyNot | 01/15/04
Case Study  dlu | 01/15/04
They have a distro...  Robert Crocker | 01/15/04
include database software from Oracle's MySQL ?  NemesisNL | 01/15/04
Oracle's MySQL  kiz | 01/15/04
MySQL  JWatson77 | 01/15/04
re: MySQL  kiz | 01/15/04
The company can be bought  NemesisNL | 01/15/04
It all belongs to SCO!  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/15/04
Eggs  Louis Ross Focke | 01/15/04
Great, good hardware software service sales HP  FilledOut | 01/15/04
HP Leeches from Linux Community  brenthawkinsmd | 01/15/04
Nothing new,  FilledOut | 01/17/04
You don't say -  charlie_sutcliffe@... | 01/15/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement