On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 28:
Next »
« Previous
Ok, let's talk GPL profit models
Sure, no problem.

Here's some of the GPL models as I see them:

-Selling distributions: While this works well for RedHat and other vendors who are selling entire OSes, it doesn't work well with much else. It also requires a lot of resources to ensure everything works together properly.

-Dual licensing: This is great, but *whoops* it requires selling a proprietary version of the software. You're not really making a profit because the software is open, but you do see the benefits of having it open. Unfortunately, the GPL itself is not very friendly to the dual licensing scheme. Usually another licence has to be used. This is probably the best & most successful licensing.

-Selling other stuff (advertising, t-shirts, etc) with the software: Again, this has little to do with whether the software is GPLed, and usually profit is not very large. Also, coming up with ad designs, t-shirt designs, etc is a quite a bit of work by itself, and most developers want to mess with code, not art wink. Most coders are horrible artists anyways.

-Makring a profit off legislation: Umm, yeah, some people actually do this. Unfortunately, it's very unpredictable (always chance of losing and getting caught in countersuits) and the law was designed for crime and punishment, not as a source of income.

-Integrating open source & proprietary libraries into a sellable piece of software: Another possible good way to make a profit, but mostly incompatible with the GPL. Possible with some other open source licenses.

Seriously, when I create a piece of software and look for libraries and stuff to use to make my job easier, I want to consider both camps to see what's best. I don't want to limit myself just because of a troublesome license. What is wrong with this desire to not limit myself? How is this in any way being close minded?
Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 08/10/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

GPL3 first public draft due early 2006  Loverock Davidson | 08/09/05
I've heard it will try and restrict web services  toadlife | 08/10/05
Hearing rumours?  whisperycat | 08/10/05
Why would I care?  voska | 08/10/05
I'm not at one with the GPL.  CobraA1 | 08/10/05
I agree  voska | 08/10/05
Well Said (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/10/05
Fortunately  Michael Kelly | 08/10/05
It's just a (overly complicated) software license.  toadlife | 08/10/05
For the most part  Michael Kelly | 08/10/05
Microosft's EULA  toadlife | 08/10/05
That I do know  Michael Kelly | 08/10/05
It isn't true  voska | 08/10/05
But...  rapson | 08/10/05
I meant  Michael Kelly | 08/10/05
Tell me about it  rapson | 08/10/05
People, especially corps, need software they can trust ? OSS.  Vily Clay | 08/10/05
Okay, so let's pretend...  bill@... | 08/10/05
Do not pretend, just show me signs of decent intelligence & we?ll talk.(NT)  Vily Clay | 08/10/05
Reason?  rapson | 08/10/05
Why should I discuss ALGEBRA with guys who don?t know simple MATH? (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/10/05
Like this  voska | 08/10/05
It?s HUGE,e.g. you can pick up $bil market that is lost by high prices.(NT)  Vily Clay | 08/10/05
Ok, let's talk GPL profit models  CobraA1 | 08/10/05
OK, let?s go. For the beginning - ...  Vily Clay | 08/10/05
Hmm . . .  CobraA1 | 08/11/05
I?ll try to be as simple as I can.  Vily Clay | 08/11/05
Make No Mistake, Software IS Politics  Fiepoto | 08/11/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here