SCO takes Linux licenses global

TalkBack 2 of 128:: Next »; « Previous

Thread View
Flat View

hmm hmm: They also failed to show some intelligence as well. Maybe that will be demanded by the court in the us as well; Posted by: NemesisNL Posted on: 01/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hmmm.... BitTwiddler | 01/14/04

hmm hmm NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Wow... Martin Marvinski | 01/14/04

Yeah! whatever.... DarbyOhara | 01/14/04

This will be fun NemesisNL | 01/14/04

U.S. Courts run Linux IT_User | 01/14/04

LOL NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Which court? Chad_z | 01/14/04

Yea, why dont they. jpfitz@... | 01/15/04

i thought ryusen | 01/14/04

libelous claims on their website NemesisNL | 01/14/04

my guess is ryusen | 01/15/04

This could be entertaining MarcB_z | 01/14/04

Bring it on Fred Fredrickson | 01/14/04

Agree, let's do it! dg mh | 01/14/04

If SCO were right... sinkme | 01/14/04

are you serous? ryusen | 01/14/04

You have to admit... No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

they have large brass ones mgalle | 01/14/04

Nahhh NemesisNL | 01/14/04

They are just making money voska | 01/14/04

Not from licensing, they're not! dicktaurus@... | 01/14/04

Sure it's From Licensing voska | 01/14/04

stock manipulation... ryusen | 01/14/04

They (SCO) tried this in Germany and failed B.O.F.H. | 01/14/04

SCO are Patsies for Microsoft FUD Scare MacGeek2121 | 01/19/04

Fighting the good fight Mike Cox | 01/14/04

You go, Mike! IT_Firefighter | 01/14/04

I don't think it's satire James T. Kirk | 01/14/04

It's satire. Steve Summers | 01/14/04

Sounds like a rock band Chad_z | 01/14/04

Mike Cox's post is offensive! he is violating my IP by posting it. critek1@... | 01/14/04

what fud? ryusen | 01/14/04

Fighting the good fight speed140 | 01/14/04

LOL, that's a good one haha ThereThere | 01/15/04

Confusing John Carroll

| 01/14/04

Confusing orlando@... | 01/14/04

Sorry, you are wrong. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

That is just IBM.. Patrick Jones | 01/14/04

True, but... No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Third Party Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Huh? No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

No they do not NemesisNL | 01/14/04

I've seen no court ruling to support that claim. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

burdon of proof ryusen | 01/14/04

Burden of proof is half right. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

eh? ryusen | 01/14/04

It's not that easy John. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

re: It's not that easy John. Iain_Peters | 01/14/04

Champion stinker Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Now that is funny! No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

What SCO and Novell are debating is System 5 B.O.F.H. | 01/14/04

re: Confusing Iain_Peters | 01/14/04

The might not like our courts NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Unless SCO is right. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Maybe Patrick Jones | 01/14/04

Again, its NOT the code. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Isn't that what the Linux billing is about? doctormoriarty | 01/14/04

That's where it gets very murky. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

IBM suit is not about code sinkme | 01/14/04

You are arguing 2 different things... Patrick Jones | 01/14/04

Sort of, maybe, and who knows... No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

So the users have no concern Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Unless the courts rule... No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

What IP? Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

But technically it is the code voska | 01/14/04

"Methods and Concepts" Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

NO, the code has little if anything to do with it. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Yagotta, its called a contract. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Yes, it's a contract Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Let me clear the IBM thing up slopoke | 01/14/04

Slowpoke, sorry but you are wrong. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

That's still code voska | 01/14/04

Voska, no it's not code. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

it is in the code rgriffith64@... | 01/14/04

Right about what? Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Have you a cite? No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Dec. 5th hearing dscherf | 01/14/04

Thanks, I'll look it over. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Possibility? Balderdash. John Le'Brecage | 01/14/04

Sorry, you are wrong. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

"...always a possibility." ? Yeah, right, between ZERO & NIL. dicktaurus@... | 01/14/04

Even *IF* SCO is right... Robert Crocker | 01/14/04

exactly JWatson77 | 01/15/04

more likely ryusen | 01/14/04

Possibility NoB$ | 01/14/04

Forced you into the gutter again I see. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

don't you think... ryusen | 01/15/04

Unless SCO is right NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Confusing? Not really. Eggs Ackley_z | 01/14/04

Confusing, maybe, but a good strategy JJ_z | 01/14/04

No, JJ Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

So I'm a fence NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Confusing, maybe, but a good strategy JJ_z | 01/14/04

It's all very clear Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

It's so clear it's costing millions. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Exactly!!!!! NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Even slam-dunk defenses cost money, Don Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Point being, it's not "clear" or simple. No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Quirk! Yagotta B. Kidding | 01/14/04

Poor bitty. Does not get it. NoB$ | 01/14/04

Somebody please Netizen Kane | 01/14/04

Message has been deleted. RobertoSalazar | 01/14/04

FUD Unicornrider | 01/14/04

Yup Martin Marvinski | 01/14/04

re: FUD Iain_Peters | 01/14/04

work for IBM NemesisNL | 01/14/04

Move to Taiwan doctormoriarty | 01/14/04

Nobody has ever won attacking own base MartinT_z | 01/14/04

Re: Nobody has ever won attacking own base jimmied43 | 01/15/04

Going global might put SCO execs in physical danger jjon2121 | 01/14/04

Stock pump NT Admin | 01/14/04

That's odd... fullebr@... | 01/14/04

What IP? rgriffith64@... | 01/14/04

Clueless bitty, as usual. NoB$ | 01/14/04

Sorry full of B$ No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04

Bitty's argument shown flawed, takes authoritarian attitude. NoB$ | 01/14/04

nice words... ryusen | 01/14/04

2-Bit?! Not trying to convince anyone? But you're a paid Micro$hill! dicktaurus@... | 01/14/04

SCO CEOs arrested for extortion. speed140 | 01/14/04

I am tired of - SCO: put up or shut up ! Chris.Papoudaris@... | 01/15/04

OK SCO, come on... Frodo42 | 01/15/04

Can't deliver uheg | 01/15/04

KISS wbs00001 | 01/15/04

sco can't sell a linux license JWatson77 | 01/15/04

What would be an appropriate reply to SCO's insanity... Motu | 01/15/04

Cool cmalpeli | 01/21/04

Hmmm cmalpeli | 01/21/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now
VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Meet Doc

Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
Check out Doc’s Blog on ZDNet
Help your company, help the earth I want to share with you the Environmental Defense Fund Paper Calculator, which allows you to gauge your organization's environmental impact.
Which is Greener: Paper or Digital? The Answer May Surprise You Anything we can do to reduce paper consumption is good. But what about the impact of digital waste?
Produced by
ZDNet and

Read the original story

SCO takes Linux licenses global

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Meet Doc

Blogs

Product Reviews

Videos

White Papers and Webcasts

Downloads

More

ZDNet News & Blogs

Product Reviews

Product Blogs

White Papers & Webcasts

Downloads