On TechRepublic: 12 tech terms that make you sound old
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 16 of 19:
Next »
« Previous
Legal actions required - to clear up
Both lawyers in 1995/1996 has done a bad job with lousy contracts.

This issue between SCO and Novell should be cleared up in court - in a short time.

This would be good for *all* parties here.

Chris
Posted by: Chris.Papoudaris@...   Posted on: 01/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

If SCO wants to publish, Why not start with details on what IP was stolen ?  Plain Logic | 01/13/04
Forget details....  doe_z | 01/13/04
Lame issue  Mike Cox | 01/13/04
Doesn't look good for Novell.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/13/04
Wasn't 1/12/04 the court's imposed "Put up or shut up" date for SCO ???  Plain Logic | 01/13/04
The Judge Gave The Order On Dec.05.03  afterbrnr | 01/13/04
Any "facts" to back up your opinion, Bit?  dscherf | 01/13/04
News release. Bitty is Darl's other brother.  NoB$ | 01/13/04
Why not?  MarcB_z | 01/14/04
Not that it helps SCO... But..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Huh?  bgoss@... | 01/14/04
Doesn't Look Good for SCO.  Plain Logic | 01/13/04
Re: Those who back SCO will also suffer.  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/14/04
Who will suffer?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
business as usual  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Legal actions required - to clear up  Chris.Papoudaris@... | 01/14/04
It doesn't matter  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
The claim they didn't know.  jpfitz@... | 01/14/04
Schedule 6.3 "Change of Control" missing  jfalknor | 01/22/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here