On The Insider: White House Party Crashers Won't Testify
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 19:
Next »
If SCO wants to publish, Why not start with details on what IP was stolen ?
This continual refusal to "let the world see" proves they are running scared.
Posted by: Plain Logic   Posted on: 01/13/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

If SCO wants to publish, Why not start with details on what IP was stolen ?  Plain Logic | 01/13/04
Forget details....  doe_z | 01/13/04
Lame issue  Mike Cox | 01/13/04
Doesn't look good for Novell.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/13/04
Wasn't 1/12/04 the court's imposed "Put up or shut up" date for SCO ???  Plain Logic | 01/13/04
The Judge Gave The Order On Dec.05.03  afterbrnr | 01/13/04
Any "facts" to back up your opinion, Bit?  dscherf | 01/13/04
News release. Bitty is Darl's other brother.  NoB$ | 01/13/04
Why not?  MarcB_z | 01/14/04
Not that it helps SCO... But..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
Huh?  bgoss@... | 01/14/04
Doesn't Look Good for SCO.  Plain Logic | 01/13/04
Re: Those who back SCO will also suffer.  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/14/04
Who will suffer?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/14/04
business as usual  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
Legal actions required - to clear up  Chris.Papoudaris@... | 01/14/04
It doesn't matter  NemesisNL | 01/14/04
The claim they didn't know.  jpfitz@... | 01/14/04
Schedule 6.3 "Change of Control" missing  jfalknor | 01/22/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here