On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 24 of 46:
Next »
« Previous
More to come...
Well, I'm not surprised to hear this at all given that Americans now live in a police state. I've known that they felt that having a computer is to much power for the common citizen to have and the powers that be or the real party of interest* that want to suppress that power and censor as much as they can and will do anything within their reach, which is anywhere, to accomplish their objective no matter how much fraud and corruption they perpetrate on the people.

I have knowledge of money mechanics and my further indignation comes from how the creation of money comes in to being in the first place. What you have is intrinsically worthless commercial script anyhow. The US government nor the private banks is not secretive about the nature of money so if you are interested there are many books including the law from your own government about the subject. I would suggest the book by G. Edward Griffin ?The creature from Jekyll Island? and you can go to www.realityzone.com. However I wish not to get in depth about money since it could have is own topic and discussion in and of itself. But I do fell it is worth mentioning since it is a component in the topic.

What we have here is the private banks of the world, which all the banks of the world are created, owned and controlled by the same people,(look it up if you don't believe me does Rothchild ring a bell)asking software companys who make image creation and manipaltion software to limit to uses of what you paid and worked hard for. In other words they are inhibiting by design what technology can do. Now if that doesn't sound backwards I don't know what else would! We as humans should be evolving not de evolving and should only be limited be what is humanly incomprehensible. Companies and governments are inhibiting invention and innovation. What we would eventualy have is software that can't do nothing. Why would anyone pay for this stuff. What would be next? Any reasonable person would to ask. Would Adobe make other uses of their software unusable because of the question of legality. Would the US government, and others, make word processing software not be able to type certain words which it may consider subversive material or because it may hurt someone feelings. There are plenty of others too trying to do this the RIAA(Recording Industry Association of America which may have connections with the banks)for example. And that will not be the end of it.

This is constantly happening with companies using their political lobbyists power and corporate interests which is nothing less then bribery to persuade the government to secure their so called rights. But you can't invade peoples rights to secure others. That would be in contradiction to the whole meaning of rights. And what they can't get done by merely asking them to do it, which I'm sure money was exchanged, they would get passed by legislation and enforced by law. Sounds impossible you say? Remember Adolf Hitler came in to power through law! The only remedy is to not purchase software and hardware that have these so called security features. And who's security are they referring to ours or theirs. It's like going to McDonalds and buying a ?Value Meal? once you consider your cost involved vs. theirs you may began to see who's getting the value. Sure they can still call it a ?Value Meal? but my point is that you have to look at the relative context in which the meaning of the words are defined. Then you should understand the object getting the benefit. With that being said you should be able to figure out what the government or anyone for that matter says about security and protection.
Posted by: concernedcitizen   Posted on: 01/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

ADOBE saving us from ourselves... - TEST it YOURSELF  povimage | 01/09/04
Orwelling, sad, and easily defeated...  BillDollar | 01/10/04
Money wasted!!  womanmarine | 01/12/04
Photoshop CS  BobWeston | 01/09/04
Your damned if you do and your damned if you dont..chill.  jimk_z | 01/10/04
To each thier own  Pongo13 | 01/10/04
No, don't chill...  robshreve | 01/11/04
Oh... my... god...  Zulummar | 01/11/04
Product Activation in Adobe Software  tic swayback | 01/12/04
Not Worth It  RoyTyrellFl | 01/09/04
Can you say class action lawsuit?  d_jedi | 01/10/04
Objections  Martin Marvinski | 01/10/04
hmmm  Zulummar | 01/11/04
Can you say class action lawsuit?  hognoxious | 01/11/04
Can you say class action lawsuit?  d_jedi | 01/11/04
Who next?  slapmaxwell | 01/12/04
So what else is Adobe not telling us about their products?  KECKSTER | 01/10/04
who pays for the rd costs for this  JWatson77 | 01/10/04
GIMP  pj-xmesh | 01/10/04
Our cars DO monitor our driving  radellaf | 01/15/04
Orwellian, sad, and easily defeated...  BillDollar | 01/10/04
What next  FilledOut | 01/10/04
Adobe Announces new Ashcroftware Line of Products  pollymathis | 01/10/04
More to come...  concernedcitizen | 01/11/04
Amen...  robshreve | 01/11/04
On second thought, this may be a good thing...  robshreve | 01/11/04
don't buy adobe  gsbtech | 01/11/04
Waste of time  John L. Ries | 01/11/04
When you voted for Bush, you should have expected this  Atlant | 01/12/04
Government Control is Non-Partisan  mhanratty | 01/12/04
Constitutional rights  acetroubleshooter | 01/12/04
You're exactly right.  libertyaikido | 01/13/04
Freedom is soooo inconvenient  Sunny Jalolly | 01/12/04
Ignorant Americans  Stupid_people | 01/12/04
Painting with a broad brush, are we?  kywriter1@... | 01/12/04
You got it all wrong  Stupid_people | 01/12/04
Which party is that?  tic swayback | 01/12/04
People like you make Republicans look bad  ndelc | 01/12/04
Where does it end???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/04
Simple solution  Chris Moller | 01/12/04
Shhhhhhh .... don't give out ideas  toomuchgreeatea@... | 01/12/04
We NEED better labling laws for digital content.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/12/04
Agreed, and throw in the license agreements too!  tic swayback | 01/12/04
What a stupid idea.  bhanes@... | 01/12/04
hehehehehhe. what a waste!!!  princessangry | 01/13/04
Just advances the open source alternative  FilledOut | 01/15/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here