On GameSpot: Share your Modern Warfare 2 experiences
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 51:
Next »
« Previous
No, it's for real and will likely succeed.
Before poo-pooing Go's claims, have a look who made the '20 year' comment - it was a Microsoft spruiker.

Microsoft introduced 'pen computing' to thwart Go - they even added handwriting recognition to Word before Windows 95 was released. Go's market was sufficiently reduced that they couldn't survive, subsequent to their demise Microsoft promptly lost interest in pen computing (sound familiar?).

Microsoft's actions have to be seen in the light of a monopolist (proven by Jackson and supported by the court of appeals). Their actions are therefore held to a different yardstick than if they were just another competitor giving away product to boost sales.

If the tablet PC is the best MS can do, then they are still behind where Go was 10 years ago.
Posted by: Fred Fredrickson   Posted on: 07/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

More talk from MS  Richard Flude | 07/01/05
Go files antitrust suit against Microsoft  Loverock Davidson | 07/01/05
You probably think that Sun, AOL, and IBM did not have a case either.  DonnieBoy | 07/02/05
Poor LoveyDove has turned Microshill Extraordinaire  Jeff Spicoli | 07/02/05
The latest installment from that Mike Cox imitator:  Judas I. | 07/02/05
Antitrust form 20 years ago?  jmills@... | 07/01/05
You don't know your history, do you?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/03/05
No I think you don't know your head from your arstechnica  jmills@... | 10/11/05
Guess this money grab  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
No, it's for real and will likely succeed.  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
But...  rapson | 07/05/05
Funny even then, I couldn't buy a computer with DRDOS on it. (NT)  Update victim | 07/04/05
But you could buy a computer with PCDOS  voska | 07/04/05
Go was another company  John Zern | 07/02/05
The OS SHOULDN'T be that important.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/03/05
What are you talking about?  Squawkbox | 07/04/05
OH !  Update victim | 07/04/05
You mean FreeDOS counts as an OS  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Sorry You are wrong  Squawkbox | 07/04/05
No, you're wrong  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
Still wrong!  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Not any more  rapson | 07/06/05
Dell  richhayes | 07/05/05
Just because Dell doesn't offer it ...  ShadeTree | 07/05/05
AHH!  Real World | 07/05/05
Ha ha  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
It's the new linux tax  Boot_Agnostic | 07/05/05
Wrong conclusion!  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
No that's not it  osreinstall | 07/07/05
And you point is??  michaeldschmidt | 07/07/05
Go could would should ve shined the Apple  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Next up...  Rodney Davis | 07/02/05
Uhhhh....  bugmenotznet | 07/02/05
That's my point...  Rodney Davis | 07/03/05
Read More About It (TM)  bugmenotznet | 07/02/05
Exactly.  GuyAlanDye | 07/03/05
Why did he wait so long to sue?  Rodney Davis | 07/03/05
Dunno  Mark Miller | 07/04/05
You refer to the DOJ several times  vferrara | 07/05/05
Why he waited so long to sue.....  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/05/05
But if the case had merit...  Rodney Davis | 07/06/05
Go legal action against Microsoft  ALFRED_z | 07/02/05
So what about Apple?  michaeldschmidt | 07/07/05
Let the evidence be the seed  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Billions in the bank  voska | 07/04/05
Ongoing Criminal Enterprize!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/05/05
I'll bite  vferrara | 07/05/05
Not to mention...  rapson | 07/05/05
One plus One does not equal three  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Sorry this post is to the wrong response(nt)  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Take your Meds boy!  osreinstall | 07/07/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here