On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 39 of 51:
Next »
« Previous
You refer to the DOJ several times
You do realize, don't you, that the DOJ's involvement is totally unnecessary in filing a civil antitrust suit? While it is far easier to prevail in a civil court when a criminal court has already convicted, it is still quite possible to prevail without the previous criminal conviction.

The fact is that the DOJ's successful prosecution of MS on monopoly abuse charges makes these lawsuits far easier to prove. The problem with this particular case, however, is that it predates MS's true rise to monopoly status.

Did MS play unfair with GO? I don't know. I do know, however, that GO should have asserted this claim some 15-20 years prior.
Posted by: vferrara   Posted on: 07/05/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

More talk from MS  Richard Flude | 07/01/05
Go files antitrust suit against Microsoft  Loverock Davidson | 07/01/05
You probably think that Sun, AOL, and IBM did not have a case either.  DonnieBoy | 07/02/05
Poor LoveyDove has turned Microshill Extraordinaire  Jeff Spicoli | 07/02/05
The latest installment from that Mike Cox imitator:  Judas I. | 07/02/05
Antitrust form 20 years ago?  jmills@... | 07/01/05
You don't know your history, do you?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/03/05
No I think you don't know your head from your arstechnica  jmills@... | 10/11/05
Guess this money grab  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
No, it's for real and will likely succeed.  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
But...  rapson | 07/05/05
Funny even then, I couldn't buy a computer with DRDOS on it. (NT)  Update victim | 07/04/05
But you could buy a computer with PCDOS  voska | 07/04/05
Go was another company  John Zern | 07/02/05
The OS SHOULDN'T be that important.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/03/05
What are you talking about?  Squawkbox | 07/04/05
OH !  Update victim | 07/04/05
You mean FreeDOS counts as an OS  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Sorry You are wrong  Squawkbox | 07/04/05
No, you're wrong  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
Still wrong!  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Not any more  rapson | 07/06/05
Dell  richhayes | 07/05/05
Just because Dell doesn't offer it ...  ShadeTree | 07/05/05
AHH!  Real World | 07/05/05
Ha ha  Fred Fredrickson | 07/05/05
It's the new linux tax  Boot_Agnostic | 07/05/05
Wrong conclusion!  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
No that's not it  osreinstall | 07/07/05
And you point is??  michaeldschmidt | 07/07/05
Go could would should ve shined the Apple  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Next up...  Rodney Davis | 07/02/05
Uhhhh....  bugmenotznet | 07/02/05
That's my point...  Rodney Davis | 07/03/05
Read More About It (TM)  bugmenotznet | 07/02/05
Exactly.  GuyAlanDye | 07/03/05
Why did he wait so long to sue?  Rodney Davis | 07/03/05
Dunno  Mark Miller | 07/04/05
You refer to the DOJ several times  vferrara | 07/05/05
Why he waited so long to sue.....  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/05/05
But if the case had merit...  Rodney Davis | 07/06/05
Go legal action against Microsoft  ALFRED_z | 07/02/05
So what about Apple?  michaeldschmidt | 07/07/05
Let the evidence be the seed  Boot_Agnostic | 07/04/05
Billions in the bank  voska | 07/04/05
Ongoing Criminal Enterprize!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 07/05/05
I'll bite  vferrara | 07/05/05
Not to mention...  rapson | 07/05/05
One plus One does not equal three  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Sorry this post is to the wrong response(nt)  ShadeTree | 07/06/05
Take your Meds boy!  osreinstall | 07/07/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here