On mySimon: Body Solid EXM 3000LPS
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 43 of 69:
Next »
« Previous
ye,it's the vulnerable 'features' that Linux lacks ...
"ye" keeps harping on about "feature parity" with XP on older hardware when XP is incapable of performing those features on the same hardware.

Why is XP is incapable? Because of the added overhead required to run the third party firewall, antivirus and spyware removers to safely use XP in any environment.

And it's not as if the majority of Microsoft's customers have the choice of running any else but XP, since Microsoft has withdrawn full security support for windows9x and ME and very soon windows 2000. In fact the next version of Internet Explorer is only going to be available for windows XP SP2, that remainding Microsoft users will have to live with the exposed vulnerabilities...

It's the vulnerable 'features' that Linux lacks that make it a better choice for many enterprises. They do not have to replace all the desktops, they have choice to deploy Linux based alternatives at that will cost a lot less than upgrading to XP.

Read "Linux on the Desktop at work and worth it"
http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=5&threadID=165827&start=0
Posted by: David Mohring   Posted on: 05/12/05 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Silly Wabbit, older PCs are for Linux..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/12/05
Not any more...  ye | 05/12/05
Now that I would have to have verified to believe.  Laff | 05/12/05
I second that  nucrash | 05/12/05
You're welcome to try it yourself...  ye | 05/12/05
KDE and GNOME eye-candy are just as bloated...  Knorthern Knight | 05/12/05
Yes Fedora 3 is a pig  osreinstall | 05/13/05
RULE: Run Up to date Linux Everywhere  David Mohring | 05/12/05
If...if...if  ye | 05/12/05
*Replace* not remove functionality  David Mohring | 05/12/05
But does it have feature parity?  ye | 05/12/05
WHAT functionality? You need to be  michael-t | 05/12/05
I asked for feature parity...  ye | 05/12/05
No surprise :  michael-t | 05/12/05
Make a feature list  toomuchgreeatea@... | 05/12/05
Remember, KDE and Gnome are GUIs, not Linux..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/12/05
More than that...  ye | 05/12/05
I've used XP with 128 once before.. not pretty..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/12/05
I have...  ye | 05/12/05
Suggestion  toomuchgreeatea@... | 05/12/05
Right.....  michael-t | 05/12/05
Re-take your logic class, please.  CobraA1 | 05/12/05
SuSE 9.3  Linux User 147560 | 05/12/05
Right, I Believe You  nikoli | 05/13/05
Where do you live?  Linux User 147560 | 05/13/05
Addnedum  Linux User 147560 | 05/13/05
Yep, Linux has been there, done that  BobF_z | 05/13/05
Damn Small Linux, LTSP and saving with WINE  David Mohring | 05/12/05
Feature parity...  ye | 05/12/05
386/25...? Now you're just being plain silly.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/12/05
How so?  ye | 05/12/05
Maybe you can give a list  toomuchgreeatea@... | 05/12/05
You still have one of those that actually runs?  balsover | 05/13/05
He says how Linux won't run on it with  Hugh Jass | 05/14/05
Microsoft & Older PC's  wadeprater | 05/12/05
Microsoft tries to breathe life into older PCs  Loverock Davidson | 05/12/05
All depends upon the pricing.  Judas I. | 05/12/05
It would be worth it  Loverock Davidson | 05/13/05
Are your clients running apps via Terminal Services  Hugh Jass | 05/14/05
Both  Loverock Davidson | 05/14/05
Should be good for business  DarthRidiculous | 05/12/05
MS is openly  michael-t | 05/12/05
ye,it's the vulnerable 'features' that Linux lacks ...  David Mohring | 05/12/05
It's no longer XP...  ye | 05/12/05
OK, does a USELESS XP have the 'feature parity' of USEFULL Linux?  David Mohring | 05/12/05
David, David, you  michael-t | 05/12/05
My point exactly:  michael-t | 05/12/05
Now MS not only offers 'light-weight' kernel but  michael-t | 05/12/05
Big Fat Zero, until MS finally fixes TermSrvr client license lease bugs  wti | 05/13/05
I'm impressed  mlindl | 05/13/05
License costs  Roger Ramjet | 05/13/05
Maybe.. But not necessarily...  Wolfie2K3 | 05/13/05
The Great MS Solution!  Reverend MacFellow | 05/13/05
DOWN boy.. DOWN!  Wolfie2K3 | 05/13/05
most of these used computers will presumably have OEM win95/win98 on  hipparchus2000 | 05/16/05
and just how is this different from winCE?? and no guarantee for backwards  wessonjoe | 05/13/05
The difference between Windows embedded and WinCE  balsover | 05/13/05
Eiger/Tiger...Another Masterful MS Innovation  itanalyst | 05/13/05
The Eiger Sanction!  Reverend MacFellow | 05/13/05
THE EIGER SANCTION!  Reverend MacFellow | 05/13/05
Good move by MS!  George Mitchell | 05/13/05
No  Reverend MacFellow | 05/13/05
What's wrong with this picture?  MepisLINUXuser | 05/13/05
haha - they had to bolt IE in  JasonL31 | 05/14/05
long time coming  timpin1@... | 05/15/05
Why?  Altern_z | 05/15/05
Not really...  jvahabzadeh | 05/16/05
I forgot to mention...  jvahabzadeh | 05/16/05
Wow I learned something from this talkback  hipparchus2000 | 05/16/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here