Will DVD acquittal mean tougher copyright laws?

TalkBack 32 of 57:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

The Only Ignorance

is that DMCA does not make a product.
And there is a descreprency in what benifits the interpretation of copyright - author,or manufacturer. They are all classical business agreements.
DMCA does not prohibit copyfriendly products.DMCA simply gives the right to secure property of a copyright.A product be it copyrighted work in consideration,or product in consideration - CAN HAVE WHATEVER FEATURES THEY DESIRE WITH DMCA.
Copy as a feature of the product
Storage as a feature of the product
Communication as a feature of the product
Performance as a feature of the product.

The halibu about the security of a copyrighted work has got to change from the view of a secured from pirate product,to a secured - and featured copyrighted product.

If the movie conglomerates want to have the idea that -""I have never seen a show wich has had itself a product feature a copy of itself as a part of the product"".

THAT IS A SCAM.The technology has not existed,but does now.They know it,we know it.Its just a little different from producing tires for you cars...- "certainly there is no way of reproducing an animate object ""...

It most in the inhibition your accustommed to.Nothing - nothing in nature creates an exact copy of itself.- nothing. Copyright is the only thing in nature that replineshes itself,while replacing none of the space it takes up.

The idea being what 'broadcast,and vcr did with Home Audio Recording act,''new technology is piracy."". The discos,and movie studios,have a cushy relationship with EVERYBody.People 'LIKE movies shows and the like....but with the advent of ''internet'',and ''desktop computers"",with Open connectivity (autoconnectivity),'new agreements can be made between the undefined line of person,and product through 'liscence of copyrighted ''goods''. These things are nothing more than body snatchers to themselves.
The very conglomerates that extoled the 'home audio recording act,are those that where involved in denying the very succesful venues of the vcr and the likes.

Everybody should have to read that in context.DMCA,DRM,copyright law does not give any verbage to usury,or contract between persons of author,or use. If fact neither of these laws give any way to a truth about 'relationship,via ""person of them"". Neither in author,in aesthetic usage,nor in person of use in aesthetic usage.

Can anybody really believe that 'cracking a security on a DVD is 'anything that is consumer oriented functionality of a copyrighted work ?

Why does this get so much play.Real pirates are 'counterfeiting,and denying royalties to authors,and manufacturers.

Persons are wanting there constitutional privacy in that person,with the objects of copyright contained as that good.

Copyright authors,dont take these whoos of piracy premise lightly,take them darkly,and put some light on the real premise of securely factualizing what it means to take advantage of what is available in digital utility for your works.

These big stories of RIAA,and its hanging 'fair-use violations out to dry,..is a really cheap venture.

International relationships of laws can certainly be not a difference than our own,however digital utility should remain servicable to everybody,WITH ITS SECURITY on both parts of persons there.

This somehow works into 'network as a computer (or computer as a network). But the status quo,and the affuendo for 'rank-and-file,is a status the majority of american with a consitutional relationship to there person has no effect to.

Right now,security conglomerates are trying to consider how they can manipulate 'your goods,either via liscence,or facilitating an error among 'security for content,and security for person.

It is an inhibition fantasy,that this remain a relationship of copyright law,and person of use.Or for something in that definitive quantity of 'good,and person being denied identity simple to premise a given premise of business conversation.


When you buy it.Its YOUR stuff.Its YOUR good.No relationship is neccesary beyond that.

The features a product shows is yours to choose among.This is the same relationship of endeavor.

When it suits them.Bandwidth,hardrive space,..the products will 'serve themselves up.

And by the way,I believe that the digital flag violates one of those amendments.Because it takes a search of your premises looking for a given item without a warrant,....and so on...

Its not all loopy fruit.And yes some puppies really look like aces chained to a drying machine.

I would like to read a headline such as:

MPAA DECIDES COPY AS A FEATURE OF THE PRODUCT IS GOOD BUSINESS.

RIAA SELLS WARRANTED MUSIC

..it isn't about piracy.Its about your security as a person.And the identity of that person to remain so.

-just talking.Happy Holidays.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 12/24/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• ENTERPRISE SECURITY GETS SMART Trend Micro IT security professionals are increasingly more concerned about the ... Download Now
• Networking and Unified Communications CDW The flourishing area of unified communications offers further testimony to ... Download Now
• A Formal Performance Tuning Methodology: Wait-based Tuning Quest Software Are you effectively testing an application's performance BEFORE it reaches ... Download Now