On BNET: Apple's insanely great marketing
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 84:
Next »
« Previous
Here is the letter.
From
http://www.linuxworld.com/story/38303.htm

Also read ...
http://zdnet.com.com/5208-1104-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1028&messageID=19180&start=-1


December 19, 2003


Re: The SCO Group, Inc. (?SCO?)

Dear Unix Licensee,

In May 2003, SCO warned about enterprise use of the Linux operating system in violation of its intellectual property rights in UNIX technology. Without exhausting or explaining all potential claims, this letter addresses one specific area in which certain versions of Linux violate SCO's rights in UNIX.

In this letter we are identifying a portion of our copyright protected code that has been incorporated into Linux without our authorization. Also, our copyright management information has been removed from these files.

These facts support our position that the use of the Linux operating system in a commercial setting violates our rights under the United States Copyright Act, including the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. We are notifying you of these facts so you can take steps to discontinue these violations. We believe these violations are serious, and we will take appropriate actions to protect our rights. No one may use our copyrighted code except as authorized by us. The details of our position are set forth below. Once you have reviewed our position, we will be happy to further discuss your options and work with you to remedy this problem.

Certain copyrighted application binary interfaces (?ABI Code?) have been copied verbatim from our copyrighted UNIX code base and contributed to Linux for distribution under the General Public License (?GPL?) without proper authorization and without copyright attribution. While some application programming interfaces (?API Code?) have been made available over the years through POSIX and other open standards, the UNIX ABI Code has only been made available under copyright restrictions. AT&T made these binary interfaces available in order to support application development to UNIX operating systems and to assist UNIX licensees in the development process. The UNIX ABIs were never intended or authorized for unrestricted use or distribution under the GPL in Linux. As the copyright holder, SCO has never granted such permission. Nevertheless, many of the ABIs contained in Linux, and improperly distributed under the GPL, are direct copies of our UNIX copyrighted software code.

Any part of any Linux file that includes the copyrighted binary interface code must be removed. Files in Linux version 2.4.21 and other versions that incorporate the copyrighted binary interfaces include:

include/asm-alpha/errno.h

include/asm-arm/errno.h

include/asm-cris/errno.h

include/asm-i386/errno.h

include/asm-ia64/errno.h

include/asm-m68k/errno.h

include/asm-mips/errno.h

include/asm-mips64/errno.h

include/asm-parisc/errno.h

include/asm-ppc/errno.h

include/asm-ppc64/errno.h

include/asm-s390/errno.h

include/asm-s390x/errno.h

include/asm-sh/errno.h

include/asm-sparc/errno.h

include/asm-sparc64/errno.h

include/asm-x86_64/errno.h

include/asm-alpha/signal.h

include/asm-arm/signal.h

include/asm-cris/signal.h

include/asm-i386/signal.h

include/asm-ia64/signal.h

include/asm-m68k/signal.h

include/asm-mips/signal.h

include/asm-mips64/signal.h

include/asm-parisc/signal.h

include/asm-ppc/signal.h

include/asm-ppc64/signal.h

include/asm-s390/signal.h

include/asm-s390x/signal.h

include/asm-sh/signal.h

include/asm-sparc/signal.h

include/asm-sparc64/signal.h

include/asm-x86_64/signal.h

include/linux/stat.h

include/linux/ctype.h

lib/ctype.c
include/asm-alpha/ioctl.h

include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h

include/asm-arm/ioctl.h

include/asm-cris/ioctl.h

include/asm-i386/ioctl.h

include/asm-ia64/ioctl.h

include/asm-m68k/ioctl.h

include/asm-mips/ioctl.h

include/asm-mips64/ioctl.h

include/asm-mips64/ioctls.h

include/asm-parisc/ioctl.h

include/asm-parisc/ioctls.h

include/asm-ppc/ioctl.h

include/asm-ppc/ioctls.h

include/asm-ppc64/ioctl.h

include/asm-ppc64/ioctls.h

include/asm-s390/ioctl.h

include/asm-s390x/ioctl.h

include/asm-sh/ioctl.h

include/asm-sh/ioctls.h

include/asm-sparc/ioctl.h

include/asm-sparc/ioctls.h

include/asm-sparc64/ioctl.h

include/asm-sparc64/ioctls.h

include/asm-x86_64/ioctl.h

include/linux/ipc.h

include/linux/acct.h

include/asm-sparc/a.out.h

include/linux/a.out.h

arch/mips/boot/ecoff.h

include/asm-sparc/bsderrno.h

include/asm-sparc/solerrno.h

include/asm-sparc64/bsderrno.h

include/asm-sparc64/solerrno.h
Posted by: David Mohring   Posted on: 12/23/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SCO has no case  avdp | 12/23/03
this case is about...  stephen732@... | 12/23/03
microsoft  tmoe | 12/31/03
public domain != OSS  dg mh | 12/23/03
README.Impt.License.Change  David Mohring | 12/23/03
except...  dg mh | 12/23/03
Hmmm  rbethell | 12/23/03
BSD actually has the most friendly commercial license of them all  Richard Flude | 12/23/03
Wrong again  bytemycode | 12/23/03
Wrong!  bytemycode | 12/23/03
the heart of the OS?????  NemesisNL | 12/24/03
True that would hurt  Suicida| | 12/27/03
SCO is desperate  Kamakazii | 12/23/03
AT&T already lost this fight  rgriffith64@... | 12/23/03
SCO has been caught in its own web of untruths  David Mohring | 12/23/03
Thank-you David...  plungermonkey@... | 12/23/03
Has anybody seen that SCO letter?  IT_User | 12/23/03
Here is the letter.  David Mohring | 12/23/03
header files?  blahblahblah | 12/29/03
I think it's on LWN.net  troutmaskreplica | 12/23/03
This is so pathetic!  DarbyOhara | 12/23/03
Judge Well's Order Granting IBM's Motions to Compel Discovery  David Mohring | 12/23/03
Chaotic Justice System  plandy@... | 12/23/03
the courts can be tied  JWatson77 | 12/26/03
a real gem:  ryusen | 12/23/03
Brain/Mouth/Foot Syndrome  Anti_RIAA | 12/24/03
This is all about obsolete technology!!  Mike Cox | 12/23/03
No thanks to .NET  plandy@... | 12/23/03
.Net=.Nothing  mrlinux | 12/23/03
RE: No thanks to .NET  gigglypuff | 12/23/03
OK got the Clue  plandy@... | 12/23/03
Quit ruining the fun  ejhonda | 12/23/03
Pretty obvious trolling for flame war.  crackez406 | 12/23/03
Hey Mike! Read this PDF.  David Mohring | 12/23/03
Um, almost all OSes use the header files in question  rbethell | 12/23/03
Can't copyright common sense!  martyj | 01/08/04
Biztalk ... that makes me laugh ...  EricMarts@... | 12/24/03
What, nothing about your MCSEs?  doctormoriarty | 12/26/03
(NT) Actually, his MCSEs are off learning Linux . . . ;-))  Plain Logic | 12/26/03
Are you sure...;-))  IT_User | 12/27/03
They are learning *nix  Suicida| | 12/27/03
Get ready to bill SCO for work on Linux  crackez406 | 12/23/03
What about the packages?  Suicida| | 12/27/03
Why no ZDNet coverage of this front?  ejhonda | 12/23/03
All I can say is...  BitTwiddler | 12/23/03
re: All I can say is...  bgoss@... | 12/24/03
That is an insult!  Chad_z | 12/24/03
(NT) - ROFLMAO  bgoss@... | 12/25/03
No money until case proven SCO  FilledOut | 12/23/03
fraudulant billing  JWatson77 | 12/23/03
SCO Scorched Earth Policy  mgardner | 12/23/03
one born every minute  Suicida| | 12/27/03
Honorable Exit  Peter Komisar | 12/23/03
re: Honorable Exit  crackez406 | 12/23/03
But then every con-artist and his dog...  Knorthern Knight | 12/23/03
Not Quite...  plungermonkey@... | 12/23/03
Points Taken  Peter Komisar | 12/23/03
Um, take a few more...  dicktaurus@... | 12/23/03
More points taken  Peter Komisar | 12/26/03
SCO has already won for someone else  tomas123 | 12/23/03
Yet it may backfire  Rick_K | 12/23/03
Who can say?  IT_User | 12/23/03
Give the admins some credit  Suicida| | 12/27/03
Credit deserved, credit noted  IT_User | 12/29/03
C programing  nite_w0lf | 12/23/03
true  bytemycode | 12/23/03
SCO lights more fires  George Mitchell | 12/23/03
Can't wait for January 5th - - - the date SCO must "put up or shut up"  Plain Logic | 12/23/03
Acutally 30 days from dec 12  rgriffith64@... | 12/24/03
64bit OS  wessonjoe | 12/23/03
Why not do what Germany did?  NemesisNL | 12/24/03
Linux developers sue SCO  NemesisNL | 12/24/03
Sounds perfectly logical too me.  Suicida| | 12/27/03
Can't wait for SCO and its silent partner $un  FilledOut | 12/24/03
Don't forget....  Rick_K | 12/24/03
SCO claims end user creation as IP  nite_w0lf | 12/24/03
don't laugh  JWatson77 | 12/26/03
SCO attempting to beat a dead dog  rgriffith64@... | 12/24/03
Dead indeed  Suicida| | 12/27/03
McBride Belongs In Prison  RobertoSalazar | 12/24/03
Blacklist SCO for the sake of the industry!  bjdtis@... | 12/28/03
Matter of time  eqwalker@... | 12/29/03
what a hoax  harri.kullberg@... | 01/07/04
Gates could not keep his fingers off  harri.kullberg@... | 01/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More