On CHOW: Holiday side dishes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 9:
Next »
Seriously?
Matthew's rambling post shows that he is quite the Noob when it comes to real synchronization technology.

BES' provide a far superior connection to a Blackberry device than activesync does to anything else.

From a management standpoint, the security and customization possible with a BES are far beyond what Activesync can do. From a performance standpoint a BES provides faster and better sync than other connections.

Blackberries can sync using a variety of other methods including POP, IMAP, downloading items through OWA, or even through an Outlook re-director running on a pc.

Matthew's awkward writing style suggests he was probably hung over, possibly still drunk when he posted this morning. He starts a paragraph as a 4th grader would: "One other thing about BlackBerry devices..." Additionally, he wrote a 39 word paragraph which consisted of a single run-on sentence.

All jabs aside, the primary point of Matthew's article is wrong. Matthew states that Blackberry has "no Exchange support." Seriously?
Posted by: tommy99   Posted on: 11/16/08  (Edited: 11/16/2008 @ 10:27) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Seriously?  tommy99 | 11/16/08
Re:  dvm | 11/16/08
re: Sync and management  tommy99 | 11/17/08
RE: Should RIM also license Exchange ActiveSync?  cloonatic | 11/16/08
Does ActiveSync work with Groupwise, Lotus etc?  deaf_e_kate | 11/17/08
Re:  dvm | 11/17/08
RE: Should RIM also license Exchange ActiveSync?  JGD11 | 11/19/08
RE: Should RIM also license Exchange ActiveSync?  mvsb@... | 03/16/09
RE: Should RIM also license Exchange ActiveSync?  samrodgers | 05/19/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc