that sort of compatibility test
chrome_slinky@... | 12/20/08
|

Yes, this is going to cause confusion with NT versioning
V@... | 12/20/08
|

Actually...
MyBlueRex | 12/20/08
|
 
If you are technically able to....
JoeMama_z | 12/20/08
|
  
They can't even be bothered to do code signing
V@... | 12/21/08
|
   
As long as there is a way to...
sykandtyed | 12/23/08
|
Re: Kernel performance graph
V@... | 12/20/08
|

Vista wasn't really in 'bad' shape to begin with
Lerianis | 12/20/08
|
 
That's just a subjective matter.
V@... | 12/21/08
|
Windows !7
shellcodes_coder | 12/20/08
|
Vista works great...
progon | 12/20/08
|
the test is wrong! you should test Vista SP1 with all post-SP1 patches
qmlscycrajg | 12/21/08
|
RE: Windows 7 7004; compatibility worries; performance beats Vista
cyanna | 12/22/08
|
Windows 7 is useless to business users.
cwood@... | 12/22/08
|

Windows 7 is useful to business users
dsljay | 12/22/08
|
 
Not to mention...
ShadowGIATL | 12/23/08
|

Vista and Windows 7 USELESS
pemmett2@... | 10/08/09
|
RE: Windows 7 7004; compatibility worries; performance beats Vista
psimilien@... | 12/22/08
|

Here ya go.
dsljay | 12/22/08
|
Just ill and fatique of permission nags.
sykandtyed | 12/23/08
|
RE: Windows 7 7004; compatibility worries; performance beats Vista
evolucion8 | 12/24/08
|
Myself and ?
dprozzo | 12/26/08
|

RE: dprozzo
zwhittaker | 12/26/08
|
Windows Development Cycles are Fatally Long
trentreviso | 12/27/08
|
OS Version 6 is not just Vista
rattlesnake0407 | 01/08/09
|