On The Insider: Beyonce and Swift Top Grammy Noms
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 47:
Next »
RE: Gmail for iPhone, Android: Updated and lookin' good
Very cool features added. Just one problem. It is a web app, which means you actually have to open it in a browser to see if you have email waiting.

Using Gmail with the mail client in the iPhone is pretty well done. Im not sure how much interest will be given by iPhone users.

Once again, not bashing it... Just wondering if iPhone users will find much use for it.
Posted by: Geuseppi   Posted on: 04/08/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

RE: Gmail for iPhone, Android: Updated and lookin' good  Geuseppi | 04/08/09
Same from the Android side...  mrlinux | 04/08/09
The only thing they need to add....  storm14k | 04/08/09
There are severe deficiencies with the GMail app in Android  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Tried it today  oncall | 04/08/09
I agree - Won't use it on iPhone  BillDem | 04/09/09
I thought the days of coding to a browser were gone?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Coding to what browser?  storm14k | 04/08/09
How does it know to exclude other browsers?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
It's simple:  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
Yes, I understand technically how it is done  NonZealot | 04/08/09
3 cheers  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
Bzzt, you fail multiple times, again  NonZealot | 04/08/09
You're not coding to the browser so much  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
The web is resolution dependent now?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Yes it is resolution dependant  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
You truly don't get it  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Why do you find that unacceptable?  oncall | 04/08/09
So it is okay to tailor a site for the marketshare leading product?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@NZ  oncall | 04/08/09
@oncall: Wow, I totally agreed with your post!!  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@sirtrollsalot  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
@adhominem attacker  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Actually I get it but obviously you don't, troll  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
You prove you don't get it  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@sirtrollsalot  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
@adhominem attacker thus proving he's lost the argument  NonZealot | 04/08/09
If the original site works best for you  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Don't have those links on Opera  NonZealot | 04/08/09
I see what you're driving at now  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Changing user agent worked  NonZealot | 04/08/09
The issue is with Google, not Apple  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
And BTW  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Troll  theoxygenthief | 04/08/09
Ever heard of web standards?  techconc | 04/08/09
Ever heard of web standards?  techconc | 04/08/09
What is the difference between these 2 statements  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Wow... Iris Browser got 100/100  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Why is it too bad?  NonZealot | 04/08/09
What I am especially curious about  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
Fair question, I'll check it out (nt)  NonZealot | 04/08/09
It is looking for webkit  NonZealot | 04/08/09
@NZ... don't jump to conclusions yet  Michael Kelly | 04/08/09
@NZ about Agent Strings...  techconc | 04/08/09
@techconc: I tested Opera with spoofed user agent  NonZealot | 04/08/09
Strawman argument...  techconc | 04/08/09
As above  NonZealot | 04/08/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc