On TV.com: BIGGEST LOSER Crowns a Winner
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 2:
Next »
Unless the sensors are of extremely high quality...
...the $600 price is not justified. But compared to the price of the Stereo Realist of 50+ years ago, it's not that expensive.

The $500 viewer isn't cheap, either. But I suspect most users will opt for it over $7 prints (and I thought NimsLo was gouging when it charged $1!), which will probably be reserved for especially good pictures.

More than 20 years ago, I took a NimsLo picture of my barber, trimming another customer, in front of the mirror, and had it enlarged to 8x10. I hope it hasn't faded.
Posted by: GrizzledGeezer   Posted on: 10/02/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Unless the sensors are of extremely high quality...  GrizzledGeezer | 10/02/09
RE: Fujifilm launches Real 3D W1 camera and 3D V1 viewer  artya@... | 10/06/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc