Aviation 2.0
oliver.widder@... | 01/06/08
|
It is possible to do a one-way connection, so users can see flight
DonnieBoy | 01/06/08
|

That's asking for trouble
Michael Kelly | 01/06/08
|
 
They already display flight information on the seat back of most airplanes.
DonnieBoy | 01/06/08
|
  
Apparently the FAA disagrees
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
   
Still, it is just a new technology with innovative features. So, sure
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
    
Did you bother to read the FAA document??
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
     
And again, this has not been done before, and the FAA just wants to double
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
     
RE: Did you bother to read the FAA document??
TomJI | 01/07/08
|
 
descent of a commercial airplane is never THAT quick...
shryko | 01/07/08
|
  
For the general public, they only care about location, temperature, air
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
  
RE: descent of a commercial airplane is never THAT quick...
SigmaX | 01/07/08
|
  
Right 200,000 feet you gotta be kidding?
Louis.Ross@... | 01/10/08
|
 
don't be melodramic
adr5@... | 01/08/08
|

Is anything hack-proof?
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
 
Come on, a one way hardware device is NOT hackable. You can do that with a
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
Whoah! Physical conections between passenger and conrol systems?
Takalok | 01/06/08
|

So strange they didn't consider the security implications
mkrigsman@... | 01/06/08
|

Come on guys, have you ever heard of optical networks and optical isolation
DonnieBoy | 01/06/08
|
 
Amen!
Mr_Wizard | 01/07/08
|
 
Read the FAA notes
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
  
Maybe it needs to be reviewed, but, untill we know more, we won't know if
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
  
When will FAA fix their procedures?
otaddy | 01/07/08
|
 
optical is not a 1 way network connection...
shryko | 01/07/08
|
  
I did NOT say that optical is a one way network connection, but, it does
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|

Common Core Computer
davidfclark@... | 01/09/08
|
Has Boeing commented on this?
otaddy | 01/06/08
|

That is one problem with bloggers, there are some that jump the gun.
DonnieBoy | 01/06/08
|
 
Boeing did comment
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
  
Still, it is just an innovative new feature that needs to be thoroughly
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
   
As I said earlier, read the FAA documents
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
    
And, that just basically says that nobody has done this before and they
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
     
Do you work for Boeing?
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
     
NO, I do not work for Boeing, but do you have half a brain?? Just think
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
common sense anyone?
jmelnik | 01/07/08
|

I absolutely agree
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|

Come on, calm down, this is ONLY a way to get flight information to people
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
 
You're doing a lot of posting...
BFD | 01/07/08
|
  
You do NOT have to be a rocket scientist to know that there are simple ways
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
Could we make it any easier for a terrorist
tony@... | 01/07/08
|

Calm down, there will be hardware methods to ensure one-way information
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|

Aston Martin Lagonda?? NT
msalzberg | 01/07/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
mrOSX | 01/07/08
|

Again, there will be hardware to make it impossible for information to flow
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
 
It will be now...
mrOSX | 01/07/08
|
  
Well, we do NOT have complete information. We do not even know if it was a
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
   
Well I hope even if the passenger and the flight control...
mrOSX | 01/08/08
|
    
Access from the ground could still be done safely, though it probably does
DonnieBoy | 01/08/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
bfilipiak@... | 01/07/08
|

Come on, you are making a fool of yourself. There WILL be hardware methods
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
 
I agree, we are not getting the full story.
otaddy | 01/07/08
|
  
Please let us know
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
   
He's in a different division now
otaddy | 01/09/08
|
    
Too bad
mkrigsman@... | 01/09/08
|
 
RE: Come on . . . .
bfilipiak@... | 01/07/08
|
  
Hey, you got me thinking. Wouldn't it be great to stream all of the control
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
  
Really, think about it, all control info, flap positions, air speed,
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
   
Better technology already exists...
CMKRNL | 01/09/08
|
 
Dude you really need to chill on
Louis.Ross@... | 01/10/08
|

Boeing hasn't been based in Washington..
msalzberg | 01/07/08
|
A little sensationalistic
Erik Engbrecht | 01/07/08
|

We're at the limits of what we know
mkrigsman@... | 01/07/08
|
Not to worry - the FAA won't certify this system
WiredGuy | 01/07/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
philbarberg@... | 01/07/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
dalgleish100 | 01/07/08
|
it's not so much the facts of this particular article that bother me
jmelnik | 01/07/08
|

RE: Its not so much . .
bfilipiak@... | 01/07/08
|
 
Come on, with such a large project, you still have to have initial designs
DonnieBoy | 01/07/08
|
 
Actually...
Erik Engbrecht | 01/07/08
|
  
Close-mindedness?
mkrigsman@... | 01/08/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
lauren.glenn@... | 01/07/08
|

wa
lauren.glenn@... | 01/07/08
|
Try again Boeing, and this time *think*
John Musbach | 01/08/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
jstarriii | 01/09/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
michael.tindall@... | 01/09/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
TonyRyb | 01/10/08
|
RE: Boeing 787 at risk of in-flight hacking
elizab | 01/11/08
|

This is good info...thanks!
otaddy | 01/11/08
|
Airlines arent thinking clearly!
blainemcdaniels | 03/01/09
|