Geeks make it right.
kozmcrae | 05/05/09
|
|
Can we locally host Google App?
Dealing | 05/05/09
|
If you could it would cost you.
Robin Harris  | 05/06/09
|
|
How 'bout HTML5 and offline database storage
Mikael_z | 05/06/09
|
By doing that...
Gladiatorcn | 05/06/09
|
Costing money to change to a better browser???
Mikael_z | 05/06/09
|
|
You didn't understand the story
Gladiatorcn | 05/06/09
|
|
Apple is the MOST proprietarey and least secure.
DevGuy_z | 05/07/09
|
You know it's a sin to lie? 
Mikael_z | 05/07/09
|
|
On the other hand...
914four | 05/07/09
|
|
A caching server could be quite inexpensive. Google and others should
DonnieBoy | 05/06/09
|
|
Caching servers won't do the trick
brotherx | 05/06/09
|
|
I am saying that Google would have to make it, and it would be specific to
DonnieBoy | 05/06/09
|
|
But...
pico_D | 05/08/09
|
|
Why would you want to?
brotherx | 05/06/09
|
|
The StorageMojo take - love it
ejhonda | 05/06/09
|
|
It was a late night . . .
Robin Harris | 05/06/09
|
|
Hey, the Google Street View truck is outside my door!
Robin Harris | 05/06/09
|
|
The one show-stopper in Google Apps (for us, at least)
ejhonda | 05/06/09
|
|
Google needs a caching server to solve that problem for the interim.
DonnieBoy | 05/06/09
|
|
OK
markbn | 05/06/09
|
|
One Question
BobinAtlanta | 05/06/09
|
|
99.9%?
pico_D | 05/08/09
|
|
Are you insane?
markbn | 05/06/09
|
|
how are local apps more reliable
shis-ka-bob | 05/06/09
|
|
Then you have a problem in your workplace.
Cayble | 05/07/09
|
|
Yankee Group Disagrees
daengbo | 05/07/09
|
|
Hmmm...
pico_D | 05/08/09
|
|
I own the sand and everything in it
GuidingLight | 05/06/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
mr1972 | 05/06/09
|
|
What about security?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/06/09
|
|
Encryption. nt
T1Oracle | 05/06/09
|
|
Encryption breaker. (nt)
No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/06/09
|
|
RE: What about security?
BitSmacker | 05/07/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
Loverock Davidson | 05/06/09
|
|
Yea, fully featured BSODing botnets...
T1Oracle | 05/06/09
|
|
What are you talking about?
Loverock Davidson | 05/06/09
|
|
Even I thought it was funny - nt
LiquidLearner | 05/06/09
|
|
Huh? sounds like a crappy enterprise technical team - nt
socialism=nowhere | 05/06/09
|
|
Better heading Blue Sky vs Solid Earth,
No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/06/09
|
|
Technically, both Microsoft and Google have cloud offerings.
B.O.F.H. | 05/06/09
|
|
And only one has desktop apps.
No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/06/09
|
|
Depends what your application needs are.
B.O.F.H. | 05/06/09
|
|
...and if you are using Sun's thin clients
914four | 05/14/09
|
|
estimated values are rubbish
Aussie_Troll | 05/06/09
|
|
Please read the report
TwinStrata | 05/06/09
|
|
GOOG=EVIL repressing the comments on the link from Aussie_troll
agent_bippy | 05/06/09
|
|
Lifehacker = Evil
daengbo | 05/07/09
|
|
Google needs to upgrade their privacy policies.
T1Oracle | 05/06/09
|
|
Rich clients can always keep ahead of thin client solutions
P. Douglas | 05/06/09
|
|
Did you last check in the eighties..?
bentedgz | 05/06/09
|
|
The downside is network dependency
hiraghm@... | 05/07/09
|
|
figures don't lie but liars can figure
georgeou | 05/06/09
|
|
Please elaborate
TwinStrata | 05/06/09
|
|
Translation
whisperycat | 05/06/09
|
|
Actually what he is saying is the cost comparisons are valid
socialism=nowhere | 05/06/09
|
|
RE: Translation
Col Mustard | 05/06/09
|
|
Maybe some specifics...
jasonp@... | 05/06/09
|
|
Don't tell me it runs with the same richness, features, or speed
georgeou | 05/07/09
|
|
Not really true.
TripleII | 05/06/09
|
|
This is such good news!
George Mitchell | 05/06/09
|
|
Feature comparison
LiquidLearner | 05/06/09
|
|
Connected. vs Disconnectd - but very good points however,
socialism=nowhere | 05/06/09
|
|
Hosted Office 2007?
CodeCurmudgeon | 05/06/09
|
|
The majority don't feel the same
LiquidLearner | 05/06/09
|
|
That has been my experience with friends...
socialism=nowhere | 05/07/09
|
|
All that, and yet it still can't open Standards based documents.
914four | 05/14/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
agleason@... | 05/06/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
smorgado@... | 05/06/09
|
|
Oops construction just cut the phone lines...bye-bye Cloud. nt
socialism=nowhere | 05/06/09
|
|
Oops, building management just killed the UPS...
914four | 05/14/09
|
|
Yeah, sure -- but...
GovOfOne | 05/06/09
|
|
So I take you don't use ATMs or on line banking either?
914four | 05/14/09
|
|
Google Apps = Microsoft Apps? Puhleeese....
dmills59 | 05/06/09
|
|
How do open-source on-site options compare?
roystonlodge | 05/06/09
|
|
Multiple cloud and multiple sand solutions: why only cite 2?
macrophage | 05/12/09
|
|
Once they get us by the short hairs...
mikifinaz1@... | 05/06/09
|
|
Not really
daengbo | 05/07/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
dmzz | 05/06/09
|
|
How can Microsoft compete? Simple: BPOS
MikevZ | 05/06/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
mswift@... | 05/06/09
|
|
Its in there
TwinStrata | 05/06/09
|
|
Wow.. there's something really odd about the assumptions.
TheWerewolf | 05/06/09
|
|
The split isn't that way
philculmer | 05/07/09
|
|
Problems with Google Docs in the Enterprise
dominigan | 05/07/09
|
|
Google isn't ready for regulated businesses
daengbo | 05/07/09
|
|
RE: Cloud vs sand: Google vs Microsoft
wolframalpha | 05/07/09
|
|
Trouble with listening to gurus is
sackbut | 05/07/09
|
|
You obviously don't work in enterprise IT
daengbo | 05/07/09
|
|
Is that your only point?
TripleII | 05/08/09
|
|
In Other News....
sciske | 05/07/09
|
|
Clarification on a few points
allenfalcon | 05/08/09
|
|
We provide integration, migration, training AND support for Google Apps
olivier.margerand | 05/12/09
|
|
Google Apps vs. Microsoft BPOS
pankajunk | 08/26/09
|
The Business Essentials Guide provides you useful tools and templates to help grow your business and save you time with automated shipping solutions.
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
