On mySimon: See-Through Blouses Add Touch of Romance
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 41:
Next »
Partitioning
Actually, I'd suggest something a bit different from the "load your common apps first" approach. I'd partition the disk and put the system and application in the inner partition, as close as possible to the hub.

At the outside, where transfer rates are highest, I'd locate the swap partition. You may hope to never hit it, but when you do it can bring your system to its knees so it's best to make it fast.

Just inside of the swap is where I'd locate my data. A good defragmenter should (no bets, though) keep the files with the most recent atime "first" on the disk on the LRU theory: what's been most recently accessed is most likely to be accessed soon.

The resaon for this is that applications are read-once and then cached in memory, while data files are generally accessed over and over.

General note: rotational latency is pretty much independent of the track zone, and rotational latency tends to have a greater impact on file access times than transfer rate does, so we're talking about relatively minor differences here.
Posted by: Yagotta B. Kidding   Posted on: 04/10/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Partitioning  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/10/07
opinions are everywhere...  diane wilson | 04/10/07
Nice thing, that  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/10/07
Other reasons to partition...  rwilson2@... | 04/11/07
Partitioning for speed  cquirke | 04/28/07
Reply to "Partitioning"  cquirke | 04/28/07
err  AdebisiTheGamer | 04/10/07
Drive 2 and swap  Yagotta B. Kidding | 04/10/07
2 drive system optimization? how 'bout 3?  internot | 04/11/07
What about  Michael Kelly | 04/11/07
Here's a question  voska | 04/10/07
Fdisk/Dos  kcredden2 | 04/12/07
Just get Diskeeper  osreinstall | 05/02/07
There's a command line one in Windows.....  Xwindowsjunkie | 08/06/09
Partitioning - yes  kcredden | 04/10/07
Why *doesn't* Linux Need Defragmenting?  D. T. Schmitz | 04/10/07
Over time linux would need fragmenting  code_Warrior | 04/10/07
Most modern Linux systems use a  Linux User 147560 | 04/10/07
Reiser does fragment a lot  patibulo | 04/11/07
Since when does fsck do defrag?  D-cat | 04/11/07
Not Really.....  linux for me | 04/12/07
Depends on the file system.  Resuna | 04/11/07
Optimisation  Crossfire | 04/11/07
VxFS file system for Linux supports optimizations AND defrag  pkjohnston@... | 05/05/07
Symantec's Norton Utilities has long carried a solution to this problem ...  George Mitchell | 04/10/07
Re: Symantec's Norton Utilities  alflanagan | 04/12/07
HARD DRIVES DO WHAT THEY'RE TOLD TO DO  BALTHOR | 04/11/07
Diskeeper I-FAAST?  AySz88 | 04/11/07
All defrag tools are not the same  Ron_007 | 04/11/07
Even easier!  pbulford | 04/11/07
Elevator Seeking  jmusto@... | 04/11/07
Quick and easy defragment.  bobn9lvu@... | 04/12/07
R A I D ! The cure all.  wesmantx05@... | 04/12/07
Multiple disk drives  lucivero@... | 04/12/07
Reduce the size of the bootable disk to minimum  don_the_newbie | 04/12/07
Backups  cwroblew | 04/17/07
PDP-11  Endoscopy | 05/02/07
Head Travel Hurts Speed  cquirke | 04/28/07
Linux, partitions, defragment, speed...  Mitch 74 | 05/02/07
Try UltimateDefrag for this in Windows  toliman | 05/03/07
Waaaait a minute  gsteele531@... | 02/19/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here