Actually, it means that some of the browsing will be much safer by using
DonnieBoy | 09/24/09
|

faster but less secure
kaninelupus | 09/25/09
|
 
Actually...
philip.lane@... | 09/25/09
|
  
I use Chrome Too - but...
wellduh | 09/29/09
|
   
Huh?
AzuMao | 09/30/09
|
 
You have remember that it's still IE
T1Oracle | 09/26/09
|
 
Phishing is FUD, you stop.
AzuMao | 09/28/09
|
  
Chrome is changing
wellduh | 09/29/09
|
   
That's weird.
AzuMao | 09/30/09
|
    
Webkit
geotopia@... | 10/19/09
|

Microsoft has no friends
geotopia@... | 10/19/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
battyr | 09/24/09
|

typical unfounded alegations
Linux Geek | 09/24/09
|
 
perhaps if you read this you would rethink your statement
nessrapp | 09/24/09
|
  
Don't be silly ...
de-void | 09/24/09
|
  
If you read this
sirpaul1 | 09/24/09
|
  
I'm not interested in reports paid for my M$
blueskip | 09/25/09
|
   
Just another MS basher
chiefpace | 09/26/09
|
    
Dont know how to search?
insanish1 | 09/26/09
|
    
Google is doing this to make better web apps
K B | 09/26/09
|
    
But there IS Chrome for Mac...
thebeans | 09/26/09
|
  
Perhaps you should read the page you're linking to, genius.
AzuMao | 09/28/09
|
 
... what?
Ceridan | 09/24/09
|
 
Allegations Spelled With 2 L's
mlbslugger | 09/24/09
|
 
Typical ridiculous statements
bored_with_the_same_old_moaning | 09/25/09
|

Are you suggesting ...
de-void | 09/24/09
|

RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
blueskip | 09/25/09
|
Purpose
p.vinnie@... | 09/24/09
|

Actually, it might be a good way to support sites that do not work without
DonnieBoy | 09/24/09
|
 
Coming around Donnie
LiquidLearner | 09/24/09
|
  
admin - that's a conversation I had today !
dgrainge | 09/25/09
|
   
You said a mouthful brother...
blueskip | 09/25/09
|

Sigh!
de-void | 09/24/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
cosuna | 09/24/09
|

He's right... but flash.. is also bad.
Ceridan | 09/24/09
|

You do know...
LiquidLearner | 09/24/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
SystemVoid | 09/24/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
IE8 | 09/25/09
|

Protecting...Oh that's what they call it!
blueskip | 09/25/09
|
Google says IE doubles Chrome Frame attack surface
jasonp@... | 09/25/09
|

RE:Google says IE doubles Chrome Frame attack surface
blueskip | 09/25/09
|
Sleep At Nights Under Redmond's Watch
preacherx | 09/25/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
rrr@... | 09/25/09
|
Literally true, but also marketing...
MichaelArgast | 09/25/09
|
So... how do we turn off the IE rendering bits and half the attack surface
ComputerGeneralist | 09/25/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
Matt Gabriel | 09/26/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
leonbakhan | 09/27/09
|
How did "attach area" becom "attack surface"?
Fred Fredrickson | 09/27/09
|
RE: Microsoft says Google Chrome Frame doubles IE attack surface
Mr Piston | 09/28/09
|
MS cannot write secure software
wellduh | 09/29/09
|
Microsoft would do better to just ask Google how they did this
Lerianis10 | 10/16/09
|