Never let it be said
Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/08/09
|
Vulnerable by default?
NonZealot | 09/08/09
|

so as long as there is a good firewall
Viva la crank dodo | 09/08/09
|
 
What do you mean by "excused"? nt
ye | 09/08/09
|
  
Perhaps I
Viva la crank dodo | 09/09/09
|
   
You misunderstood.
ye | 09/09/09
|
    
I see
Viva la crank dodo | 09/09/09
|
    
Misunderstanding squared...
jasonp@... | 09/09/09
|
     
By default the built in firewall restricts access to the port in question.
ye | 09/09/09
|
     
I would tend to agree...
jasonp@... | 09/09/09
|
     
@jasonp: We disagree
ye | 09/09/09
|

Not sure
CobraA1 | 09/08/09
|
 
My experience on "cheap consumable"..
JCitizen | 09/09/09
|
"No user action is required." Except disabling the firewall.
ye | 09/08/09
|

Except disabling the firewall AND enabling network discovery
honeymonster | 09/08/09
|
 
This is a serious problem for many.
sporkfighter | 09/11/09
|
  
Wrong and wrong
NonZealot | 09/11/09
|
So will this work...
Sleeper Service | 09/08/09
|

fresh install, no network config changes
JoeMama_z | 09/08/09
|
 
So what we're saying is...
Sleeper Service | 09/08/09
|
  
No surprises there
frgough | 09/08/09
|
  
Wrong.
sporkfighter | 09/11/09
|
   
Once again, same as above
NonZealot | 09/11/09
|
 
It is the filesharing service SMB2.0
SamCPP | 09/08/09
|
  
It isn't if you're using Windows XP...
ye | 09/08/09
|
   
But anyone who uses filesharing on a Vista/Win7 network won't do that n/t
SamCPP | 09/08/09
|
    
And anyone who uses NFS won't do it either.
ye | 09/08/09
|

Simple answer: NO
honeymonster | 09/08/09
|
Reasons why this isn't a big issue
georgeou | 09/08/09
|

Reasons why it is an issue (maybe not big)
SamCPP | 09/08/09
|
 
Correction to point 2
SamCPP | 09/08/09
|

Please
Richard Flude | 09/08/09
|
 
They shouldn't be.
ye | 09/08/09
|
  
Yet back in the real world
Richard Flude | 09/08/09
|
   
Pick a side and stick with it.
ye | 09/09/09
|
    
Link please
Richard Flude | 09/09/09
|
     
Where have I ever down played this?
ye | 09/09/09
|
     
Read this thread
Richard Flude | 09/09/09
|
 
Worse; fileservers based on 2008 or 2008R2 are exposed
honeymonster | 09/08/09
|

Reasons why it may become a big issue
honeymonster | 09/08/09
|
 
I agree.
ye | 09/08/09
|
 
If you can get code to execute before a patch is out, yes
georgeou | 09/09/09
|
 
What makes you think WS2008R2 is "definitively" exposed to this?
Johnny Vegas | 09/09/09
|
  
Software Reuse
ps.zdnet@... | 09/09/09
|
   
HAHAHA Nice FUD. In other words no, you have no idea.
Johnny Vegas | 09/10/09
|
Rare events
Yagotta B. Kidding | 09/08/09
|

Reread the post you are replying to
NonZealot | 09/08/09
|
 
Using a cellular phone/data card to access the internet....
sean_hando@... | 09/08/09
|

Not accurate
CobraA1 | 09/08/09
|
RE: Windows 7, Vista exposed to 'teardrop attack'
john doee | 09/08/09
|
This is why I always use a hardware firewall.
CobraA1 | 09/08/09
|
Other positive MS news
Richard Flude | 09/08/09
|
RE: Windows 7, Vista exposed to 'teardrop attack'
shellcodes_coder | 09/09/09
|

Thats what you get
The 'G-Man.' | 09/09/09
|
Strange logic...
jasonp@... | 09/09/09
|

The RTM version of Windows 7 appears to be unaffected.
ye | 09/09/09
|
 
Likely scenario...
jasonp@... | 09/09/09
|
  
I wasn't referring to you specifically.
ye | 09/09/09
|
RE: Windows 7, Vista exposed to 'teardrop attack'
ps.zdnet@... | 09/09/09
|

Then the "advisory" was wrong
honeymonster | 09/09/09
|
 
To back up honeymonster about SMB and SMB2...
Grayson Peddie | 09/09/09
|
All you have to do is disable SMB2....
dunn@... | 09/09/09
|
RE: Windows 7, Vista exposed to 'teardrop attack'
apjohnson@... | 09/09/09
|
RE: Windows 7, Vista exposed to 'teardrop attack'
tyvek@... | 09/09/09
|
RE: Windows 7, Vista exposed to 'teardrop attack'
diharp@... | 09/09/09
|