On CNET: Tech gifts for every budget
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 5:
Next »
« Previous
You are correct, it depends on the circumstances
Telling NoScript that you trust one site does not tell it to trust all scripts served through a site's Web page.

You are right. It would depend on if the javascript in question was linked from the trusted page (NoScript would block this) or if it was embedded into the page (NoScript wouldn't block it).

Seems to me that Firefox with NoScript meets that description

This I disagree with. NoScript actually disables the javascript engine for untrusted sources so the javascript doesn't run at all. Protected Mode (and AppArmor) allow the javascript to run but with greatly reduced permissions. NoScript doesn't trust any javascript, even if it is harmless. Protected Mode allows javascript to run but denies access to anything that the script shouldn't be messing with.

The disadvantage of NoScript is that it stops even legitimate javascript from running. Protected Mode (and AppArmor) allows legitimate javascript to run. Both fail the scenario where you get attacked by a "trusted site" but because NoScript disables even legitimate javascript, you are much more likely to turn NoScript off than Protected Mode for a certain site.

NoScript is like the gate of a gated community where there are no locks on the houses. Don't trust the mailman? Fine, you get no mail. Trust the mailman? Nothing stops him from walking into your house and stealing your stuff. Protected Mode is like a normal community. Anyone can put stuff in your mailbox but they can't get into your house.

I'll continue to use NoScript even if Firefox gets Protected Mode since they both live quite happily together! People in gated communities can still lock their doors. happy
Posted by: NonZealot   Posted on: 08/08/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's why Protected Mode (and AppArmor) are better than NoScript  NonZealot | 08/07/08
It's why Protected Mode (and AppArmor) are better than NoScript  TimothyMcGowan | 08/08/08
You are correct, it depends on the circumstances  NonZealot | 08/08/08
RE: CNET's Clientside developer blog serving Adobe Flash exploits  jtwaldo | 08/08/08
RE: CNET's Clientside developer blog serving Adobe Flash exploits  Hates Idiots | 08/08/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here