On CHOW: Vegetarian Thanksgiving dishes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 2 of 5:
Next »
« Previous
It's why Protected Mode (and AppArmor) are better than NoScript
@NonZealot:

Telling NoScript that you trust one site does not tell it to trust all scripts served through a site's Web page. If the script comes from a different server, you will be prompted to approve that, even if you have already approved the site hosting the page you've viewing.

So even if a user would have automatically approved the malicious script on CNET, all subsequent scripts would have to be approved manually. Of course, I'll grant you that users might approve each script blindly, but NoScript doesn't make it easy to do that.

I'm not arguing that NoScript would be the perfect solution, just pointing out that it doesn't work quite the way you describe.

According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb250462.aspx:
The Windows Vista security infrastructure allows Protected Mode to provide Internet Explorer with the privileges needed to browse the Web while withholding privileges needed to silently install programs or modify sensitive system data.

Seems to me that Firefox with NoScript meets that description, although it might be easier for the user to override the NoScript protection than the Protected Mode protection. But that override would take distinct effort on the part of the user, either by turning off NoScript or clicking on the Options button and allowing 101.202.303.404, for instance, to run a script.

If I'm wrong about any of this, I'd love to discuss it.

-- Tim
Posted by: TimothyMcGowan   Posted on: 08/08/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's why Protected Mode (and AppArmor) are better than NoScript  NonZealot | 08/07/08
It's why Protected Mode (and AppArmor) are better than NoScript  TimothyMcGowan | 08/08/08
You are correct, it depends on the circumstances  NonZealot | 08/08/08
RE: CNET's Clientside developer blog serving Adobe Flash exploits  jtwaldo | 08/08/08
RE: CNET's Clientside developer blog serving Adobe Flash exploits  Hates Idiots | 08/08/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here