Ought to be interesting
AbsolutelyNot | 10/19/09
|

um, no
coffeeshark | 10/19/09
|
Does MS support "open internet", or do they want us to pay for it
daniel.pereznet | 10/19/09
|

Who pays?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/19/09
|

Cost and "Openness" aren't in opposition...
timsneath | 10/19/09
|
 
Cost and "Openness" aren't in opposition...
Tsingi | 10/19/09
|
  
Silverlight, SVG and HTML 5
timsneath | 10/19/09
|
   
re: Silverlight, SVG and HTML 5
Tsingi | 10/20/09
|
    
because
keoz | 10/20/09
|
     
re:because
Tsingi | 10/21/09
|
     
And what are
keoz | 10/21/09
|
     
better standard
Tsingi | 10/21/09
|
     
So
keoz | 10/21/09
|
  
Holy ****!
keoz | 10/20/09
|

re: Does MS support "open internet", or do they want us to pay for it
bigsibling | 10/20/09
|
AHA!
Linux Geek | 10/19/09
|

Who said, the technology is cheaper
digish777 | 10/19/09
|

Better than the "works for me" or "you don't need that feature"'
transposeIT | 10/19/09
|

LOL
keoz | 10/19/09
|
RE: Free Silverlight streaming service to be replaced by paid Azure-hosted service
moosish@... | 10/19/09
|

not sure what this means for netflix
Mary Jo Foley | 10/19/09
|
I think everyone is getting confused on what this really means...
armchairtheorist | 10/20/09
|

It's at least comparing apples to fish - perhaps even...
ljmorsillo@... | 10/20/09
|
There seems to be some misunderstanding here...
Maupertuis | 10/20/09
|