It's only news if ....
n0neXn0ne | 07/16/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
Loverock Davidson | 07/16/09
|

Which part of Linux
nucrash | 07/16/09
|

Loverock, you do know that Mike Cox is back, do you?
nizuse | 07/16/09
|
 
Where is he?
Viva la crank dodo | 07/16/09
|

Loverock FUD
Don Collins | 07/17/09
|
 
Then why the Tom-Tom deal?
bpatin@... | 07/17/09
|
  
Signed too quickly
daengbo | 07/17/09
|
   
Can somebody tell me ......
cammobus@... | 07/17/09
|
    
originally, this is true
DaemonSlayer | 07/17/09
|

RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
jtollack@... | 07/17/09
|

Ha... In your wettest dreams...
awasson@... | 07/17/09
|

Allegation
DaemonSlayer | 07/17/09
|
 
absolutely right
maggietoo9 | 07/18/09
|

Spoken like someone taking a Microsoft paycheck
maggietoo9 | 07/18/09
|

Got any evidence for that statement?
LeonBA | 09/18/09
|
Novell gained in this matter
nucrash | 07/16/09
|
"The SCO Group"-pay us for protection!
DonRupertBitByte | 07/16/09
|
*** BREAKING NEWS ***
Dietrich T. Schmitz | 07/16/09
|

Bilsky is about business method patents. This was about technology patents
de-void | 07/16/09
|
 
UNSPECIFIED "enforcible" technology patents ...
George Mitchell | 07/16/09
|
  
Blackmail
Ole Man | 07/16/09
|
   
+ 1
DaemonSlayer | 07/17/09
|
 
Actually...
awasson@... | 07/17/09
|
  
Patent protection racket
Chalfont | 07/20/09
|

Old hat!
Ole Man | 07/16/09
|
 
True. True..Ole Man...Word.
Dietrich T. Schmitz | 07/16/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
Mah | 07/16/09
|
MS vs Linux
step69 | 07/16/09
|

There would...
Erroneous | 07/16/09
|
 
MS a monopoly?
step69 | 07/16/09
|
  
What about Google?
Tiggster | 07/16/09
|
   
Its amazing....
storm14k | 07/16/09
|
  
If you have a PC
maggietoo9 | 07/18/09
|
   
...what OS can you load? Answers
over2sd | 07/18/09
|
 
Apparently, you don't know the meaning of the word.
DeusExMachina | 07/18/09
|
Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
mrdt | 07/16/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
step69 | 07/16/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
jlasun | 07/16/09
|
Need the Mono folk any more evidence....
storm14k | 07/16/09
|

Mono is a positive for Linux
Tiggster | 07/16/09
|
 
The same old same old...
storm14k | 07/16/09
|
  
Ahahahahhahaha
jackbond | 07/16/09
|
   
You must be one of them...
storm14k | 07/16/09
|
    
Interesting ...
de-void | 07/17/09
|
     
Keep it in context
awasson@... | 07/17/09
|
  
Maybe you're just looking in the wrong places
eb276 | 07/16/09
|
   
I'm not talking about ASP.Net based sites...
storm14k | 07/16/09
|
    
Oh I see
eb276 | 07/16/09
|
     
I would hope they do...
storm14k | 07/16/09
|
  
After reading that.....
Erroneous | 07/16/09
|
   
Nope....
storm14k | 07/16/09
|
    
I see what yoru saying
cferriby | 07/17/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
step69 | 07/16/09
|
thought about buying a Buffalo router. now i'm positive i don't want one.:(
wessonjoe | 07/17/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
Grey Ash | 07/17/09
|
Microsquish products so weak they can only hope to win by bullying
Tom6 | 07/17/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
ceknight | 07/17/09
|
RE: Another company signs Linux patent-protection deal with Microsoft
adams484@... | 07/17/09
|
The school yard bully is trying to take kids lunches again He doesn't have
softwareFlunky | 07/17/09
|

mwahaha!
jedikitty@... | 07/17/09
|
No Mono is not positive with Linux
onetwothreemike | 07/18/09
|
Microsoft is disgusting
onetwothreemike | 07/18/09
|

the road Microsoft walks best
Ole Man | 07/29/09
|