Does this not seem odd?
chrome_slinky@... | 04/30/09
|

Well, the only thing that wasn't "close to the truth"
Lerianis | 04/30/09
|
 
Or
tymiles | 05/01/09
|
  
Or
No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 05/01/09
|
 
no need to spend thousands replacing that 'old' laptop
brokndodge@... | 05/03/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
penguin-386 | 05/01/09
|

What a joke!
mike@... | 05/04/09
|
 
expect an Window Mobile - Windows 7 Hybrid
daniel.pereznet | 06/29/09
|
  
expect an Window Mobile - Windows 7 Hybrid
daniel.pereznet | 06/29/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
penguin-386 | 05/01/09
|

Win 7 on netbooks
Mary Jo Foley | 05/01/09
|

Sure it will
bobiroc | 05/01/09
|
 
No. At least 2GB required to run Win7. Let's get real here. (NT)
No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 05/01/09
|
  
Just like Vista, which more recent reviews suggest 4GB is its sweet spot...
HypnoToad72 | 05/02/09
|
   
Most UNIX systems cache information in RAM.
ye | 05/03/09
|

Yes, it will run on them!!!
HypnoToad72 | 05/02/09
|
 
runs FINE on my eeepc 901
tora201 | 05/03/09
|
The big difference
Kaiwai | 05/01/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
Regats | 05/01/09
|
Don't hold on to XP too long, folks
mattj@... | 05/01/09
|

I expect my MacBook Pro (circa 2007) to run fast until 2011.
No More Microsoft Software Ever! | 05/01/09
|
 
Agreed. We've been conditioned to frequently upgrade.
HypnoToad72 | 05/02/09
|
 
I usually do 3-5 with out any problems
Northlite | 05/02/09
|
  
Add RAM to get it up to 512MB and ...
mwagner@... | 05/02/09
|
  
i would suggest a heavily optimized linux, not ubuntu
brokndodge@... | 05/03/09
|
 
You can choose to buy over-powered ...
mwagner@... | 05/02/09
|

It just depends on your needs
alaniane@... | 05/01/09
|
 
If it is connected to the Internet ...
mwagner@... | 05/02/09
|
  
He said it was running DOS.
ye | 05/03/09
|
   
malware for DOS
halj | 05/08/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
jinishans | 05/01/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
mwagner@... | 05/01/09
|

On what planet are you taking about?
MisterMiester | 05/01/09
|
 
I was running it ...
mwagner@... | 05/02/09
|
  
Minimal requirements
cal67 | 05/04/09
|
Or
israeljamesbond | 05/01/09
|

XP is ancient and ugly
DavidBassPlayer | 05/01/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
rednelok@... | 05/02/09
|
Sounds typical -- and given MS's minimums always need to be multiplied by 4
HypnoToad72 | 05/02/09
|
Is it possible for computers to get the swine flu?
HypnoToad72 | 05/02/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
esqban@... | 05/02/09
|
Still not usable
kokuryu | 05/04/09
|

Still not usable
gary859 | 05/04/09
|
 
necessary for business?
halj | 05/08/09
|
  
Business use of Windows 7
sasher@... | 10/15/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
Sonataice | 05/04/09
|
Hardware for the TOUCH feature
dcawasji@... | 05/05/09
|
Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor Beta Released
dkindle@... | 05/11/09
|
Here we GO AGAIN!!!
DonBurnett | 05/12/09
|
Windows 7 is slower....?!
boweb | 05/25/09
|
Optimal requirements for Windows 7
Zdenek-250 | 06/19/09
|
Can I run it on Pentium III 733 Mhz processor with 256 MB RAM?
kunal2383 | 07/19/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
shahin12 | 08/25/09
|
RE: Microsoft releases final Windows 7 system requirements
sasher@... | 10/15/09
|