On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 13:
Next »
because VS 2009 would not be free upgrade
I think MS would have a PR nightmare on their hands if this update wasn't free especially since it's adding features/support for stuff that was in beta/ctp along with VS 2008.
Posted by: ramarc   Posted on: 08/11/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

because VS 2009 would not be free upgrade  ramarc | 08/11/08
Exactly  louiswu | 08/11/08
Mary Jo Foley what a stupid question!  qmlscycrajg | 08/11/08
Take a chill pill  Tiggster | 08/11/08
It is a silly question.  mikefarinha | 09/17/08
RE: Visual Studio 2008 SP1: Why not VS 2009?  Roger_Jennings | 08/11/08
Mary Jo; Keep Up The Good Work!  Kromaethius | 08/11/08
RE: Visual Studio 2008 SP1: Why not VS 2009?  appleRulez | 08/12/08
Mo betta coverage?  DonBurnett | 08/12/08
The first bug appears !  Free_Thinker | 08/14/08
Are You Kidding?  FreeSpeech | 09/17/08
VS 2008 was a marked improvement over 2005  Roque Mocan | 09/17/08
Visual Studio 2009 is out, welcome VS2010  adiavn@... | 01/12/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement