On GameFAQs: What is error code 80710092 on the PS3?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 13:
Next »
My opinion is exactly as it is written in the article
My thoughts exactly:
?Microsoft releasing the source code to the .NET libraries may seem very cutting edge, but it?s really just going back to doing something they?ve done since the beginning of time."
Releasing the source of .NET libraries is the same as releasing the source of C runtime or MFC. It is very useful for developers. If something does not work right in the library then developer can see why and maybe find the workaround easier. However, I do not see any reason for the "buzz" about the microsoft "opening the source". It is not news at all.
Posted by: pauliusp   Posted on: 10/05/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

My opinion is exactly as it is written in the article  pauliusp | 10/05/07
Right  Richard Flude | 10/05/07
Well, I am not sure how escential the source code. I have never looked at  DonnieBoy | 10/07/07
Helps when you have a problem  Richard Flude | 10/07/07
Well, in the whole saga of the battle between MS and Free Software, this is  DonnieBoy | 10/07/07
The reason I won't be touching this with a bargepole:  odubtaig | 10/05/07
That's a fair and honest reason.  TheTruthisOutThere@... | 10/06/07
There are many sayings about assuming, none of them good.  odubtaig | 10/06/07
M$ might actually like that  mannyamador | 10/07/07
You are right, they had to open it anyway, this make them look more open,  DonnieBoy | 10/07/07
Hot air  Ole Man | 10/07/07
What about security?  bmadsen@... | 10/09/07
RE: Is Shared Source .Net a big deal? Joel and Miguel weigh in  kalodev@... | 10/12/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc