On CHOW: Can you use the handicapped bathroom?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 58:
Next »
Um, that should be good enough I guess
nt
Posted by: no_zd_user_name   Posted on: 05/27/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Um, that should be good enough I guess  no_zd_user_name | 05/27/09
Don`t worry, Craps..uhmm..macs will get them as usual...  Soulstorm | 05/27/09
Huh?  WarhavenSC | 05/27/09
True but....  Sephoroth | 05/27/09
Rediculous statements  ccd1977@... | 05/28/09
I think that's because Apple wants to do it right.  HypnoToad72 | 05/27/09
virtual knuckle-bump  unclefixer@... | 05/27/09
And that is why...  ShadowGIATL | 05/27/09
Amusing  caligula@... | 05/29/09
Intel needs to spec a backplane  DotNetPgmr | 05/27/09
Hp does a great job with their multiprocessor platforms.  Gillman_Zorgam | 05/27/09
This has nothing to do with Alienware  de-void | 05/27/09
What?  ShadowGIATL | 05/27/09
Obviously more monopoly stuff.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/27/09
Little different today  LiquidLearner | 05/27/09
Yes, I know what AMD is whining about. Makes no diff.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/27/09
I've said this repeatedly...  Spiritusindomit@... | 05/27/09
They gained less market share than they should of  LiquidLearner | 05/27/09
You assume Intel will stay relevant.  peter_erskine@... | 05/27/09
Why would anyone assume...  ShadowGIATL | 05/27/09
Intel staying relevant  ForgeAus | 05/28/09
RE: Nehalem-EX - 8 cores, 16 threads, 2.3 billion transistors, very cool!  EmperorDarius | 05/27/09
... that doesn't even make sense...  Spiritusindomit@... | 05/27/09
I'm not even sure his post is pro-Mac....  Sephoroth | 05/27/09
That is because...  ccd1977@... | 05/28/09
he meant to reply...  evilkillerwhale@... | 05/27/09
Cant fit anymore cores!  pcguy777 | 05/27/09
Actually, I saw it first in 1982.  Spiritusindomit@... | 05/27/09
RE: Can't fit anymore cores!  MadWhiteHatter | 05/27/09
IMHO we still have a few generations to go.  CobraA1 | 05/28/09
AMD loses again.  Spiritusindomit@... | 05/27/09
AMD never reverse engineered an Intel CPU!  marcfinnwilson@... | 05/27/09
What's the clock speed?  Norm_z | 05/27/09
RE: What's the clock speed?  MadWhiteHatter | 05/27/09
It's not like a Xeon will end up in many desktops  LiquidLearner | 05/27/09
Virtualization  Frankmjr | 05/27/09
Actually . . .  CobraA1 | 05/28/09
You don't understand the technology.  Spiritusindomit@... | 06/01/09
RE: Nehalem-EX - 8 cores, 16 threads, 2.3 billion transistors, very cool!  MadWhiteHatter | 05/27/09
Nehalem-EX Server oriented NOT Desktop  Ganjaman@... | 05/27/09
Unfortunately  Frankmjr | 05/27/09
What starts on the server usually eventually reaches the desktop . . .  CobraA1 | 05/28/09
Use your tech brain  BALTHOR | 05/27/09
transistors in a cpu  unclefixer@... | 05/27/09
PS- It's ok to goof sometimes,  unclefixer@... | 05/27/09
WHAT GOOD IS IT?  fvm | 05/27/09
Many will because it will enable faster processing  Patanjali | 05/27/09
Iphone with 128 threads  MeGaMiPs | 05/27/09
Then the iPhone will have replaceable batteries  Patanjali | 05/27/09
Oh, baby, oh!  metilley@... | 05/27/09
IBM called it in 2001...  Bruizer | 05/27/09
It's for SERVERS, which naturally scale more threads  georgeou | 05/28/09
Or other PARALLEL tasks.  Bruizer | 05/28/09
Nehalem-EX is primarily for servers, and sometimes workstations  georgeou | 05/30/09
RE: Nehalem-EX - 8 cores, 16 threads, 2.3 billion transistors, very cool!  8007342 | 05/28/09
Hey, Adrian, this is going to make a mess...  Beat a Dead Horse | 05/28/09
Just as a side line...  thx-1138_@... | 05/30/09
RE: Nehalem-EX - 8 cores, 16 threads, 2.3 billion transistors, very cool!  ChodaBoy | 06/01/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here