On mySimon: Buckyballs
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 44:
Next »
Ridged for her pleasure?
with a more ridged CPU requirements.

Sorry, couldn't resist. happy

RAM: 2GB.
Currently the limitation is 1GB.

Ah, that explains why I could get the Dell Mini 9 with 2GB of RAM if I chose Linux but not if I chose Windows. Oops, I just said "chose Linux" but I forgot that we can't choose Linux, Windows is always forced on us! wink
Posted by: NonZealot   Posted on: 05/25/09 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Ridged for her pleasure?  NonZealot | 05/25/09
The spec should be relaxed  Gladiatorcn | 05/25/09
Why restrict it at all?  BillDem | 05/27/09
More reasons to switch to Linux!  Grayson Peddie | 05/25/09
Linux is okay, but the Mac has greater hardware support, is faster,  HypnoToad72 | 05/25/09
Find me a MacBoo Lite that costs $300, and I'll buy it.  Grayson Peddie | 05/25/09
"Macintosh" - god bless you  hoode@... | 05/26/09
Offensive  radar_z | 05/28/09
It is maximum requirement for netbook only SKU  ArnavM | 05/25/09
You forced me  Gladiatorcn | 05/25/09
'We' did?  UAC nanny screen | 05/26/09
Vista was all minimum specs, now they're dictating maximum specs?  fr0thy2 | 05/25/09
As long as it is Ms MS it's OK with me (nt)  Economister | 05/25/09
That's how they get away with it.  fr0thy2 | 05/25/09
I was referring to the "holding and shaking" part (nt)  Economister | 05/25/09
No thanks  NStalnecker | 05/25/09
For reasonable people, switching to crap is not an option...nt  transposeIT | 05/25/09
Exactly, that's the reason I dump windoze as soon as I can  InAction Man | 05/26/09
Windoze? What are you talking about? Lay off the kool aid, man...  transposeIT | 05/27/09
There have already been a million reasons to use free OS.But still ....  Dealing | 05/25/09
When you're the biggest monopoly out there  UAC nanny screen | 05/26/09
You guys have forgotten...  Grayson Peddie | 05/25/09
Don't apologize  UAC nanny screen | 05/26/09
What? You don't have enough reasons already?  softwareFlunky | 05/26/09
These MAX SPECS are aimed at ...  mwagner@... | 05/29/09
The MS High Wire Act  Economister | 05/25/09
Explain yourself  NonZealot | 05/25/09
NonZealot? Are you sure? (Please ignore)  Economister | 05/25/09
NonZealot? Are you sure about that name?  Economister | 05/25/09
The Twofer  DannyO_0x98 | 05/25/09
The eternal power vs portability issue  Economister | 05/25/09
So.. do you expect them to give away their software for free?  Dealing | 05/25/09
Hmmmm. No, that was not really my point. (nt)  Economister | 05/25/09
A large scale assault ... from desktop Linux?  mwagner@... | 05/29/09
Less is the new more  johnfenjackson@... | 05/25/09
RE: Microsoft sets maximum hardware spec for netbook-only Windows 7 SKUs  michael2244 | 05/26/09
So I suppose these will be OEM only...  readwryt@... | 05/26/09
When Microsoft publishes the data I'll believe it...  PollyProteus | 05/26/09
RE: How Else To Mess Up? Mac/PC Commercial Material!  daves1646 | 05/26/09
yeah - this is ripe for witty exploitation!  pikeman666 | 05/27/09
This is a joke!  pikeman666 | 05/27/09
The partisanship here is remarkable...  Thunderbuck | 05/29/09
Well Within Rights - Still Clueless Though!!  daves1646 | 05/30/09
RE: Microsoft sets maximum hardware spec for netbook-only Windows 7 SKUs  garycoryer@... | 06/01/09

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement