Microsoft/TomTom settle patent infringement case
Loverock Davidson | 03/30/09
|
I don't get it!
Linux Geek | 03/30/09
|
Seems like MS exited with their tail between their legs. Notice that there
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|

Yeah, sure... they were the losers here? No
TylerM89 | 03/30/09
|
 
I'd have to agree somewhat
Tony Agudo | 03/30/09
|
  
You have no way of knowing if MS "won big time". That would depend on the
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
   
Good point on reading FAT via USB
Tony Agudo | 03/30/09
|
    
If the amount paid is insignificant, then, it is as if the suit was just
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
     
Oh please
TylerM89 | 03/30/09
|
     
You seen to forget the Lindows suit, where MS actually PAID millions
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
   
Don't expect USB sticks to use FAT much longer.
hkommedal | 03/31/09
|
 
Until we know the AMOUNT of the settlment, that is all speculation.
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
  
It's $250,000 for a perpetual license or
Tony Agudo | 03/30/09
|
   
And there is not evidence that TomTom paid any where near that. My guess is
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
    
The fantasy world where linux took over...
friedcow | 03/31/09
|
  
Obvious?
TylerM89 | 03/30/09
|
   
TomTom made no such agreement. You do NOT have to agree to the validity
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
    
What are you talking about
TylerM89 | 03/30/09
|
     
It is hard to say how things may have turned out
xXSpeedzXx | 03/30/09
|
     
There's nothing really misterious
markbn | 03/30/09
|
     
More likely that MS realized the risks of having patents invalidated and
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
     
Let me see if I understand
markbn | 03/30/09
|
     
Well, the amount paid makes a big difference. If it wask close to zero,
DonnieBoy | 03/30/09
|
     
To take the case to court will cost a LOT more.
hkommedal | 03/31/09
|