These results are worthless because...
danielbj2000@... | 03/10/09
|
Worthwhile: you likely skipped the 4GB tests
hjacobson | 03/10/09
|
|
You Must not get around much
thelaffster | 03/10/09
|
|
Not an apples to apples comparison!
dbarizona | 03/11/09
|
|
Not an apples to apples comparison!
Atheena | 03/14/09
|
Is so!
slaskoske | 04/13/09
|
|
These results are worthless because...
PBlais123 | 03/11/09
|
|
Most PCs have 2GB or less.
TheWerewolf | 03/11/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
mavr1c | 03/10/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
rblanc@... | 03/11/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
bobmatch@... | 03/11/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
Teh_Shopko | 03/11/09
|
|
And what about compatibility?
PCcritic | 03/11/09
|
|
RE: Extending these 'real' world benchmarks
the.bogmonster@... | 03/11/09
|
|
Off subject
MSFTWorshipper | 03/11/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
ossaekom@... | 03/11/09
|
|
Or... maybe the whole community really doesn't know?
TheWerewolf | 03/11/09
|
|
Vista is still PooPoo
XweAponX | 03/11/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
mschleisner@... | 03/12/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
dfarrich@... | 03/13/09
|
|
Could we also see the latencies of each of these tests? pretty please?
octavio_paz | 03/13/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
littlechiefwaz@... | 03/13/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
derf24 | 03/14/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
stevevfw | 03/19/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
stevevfw | 03/19/09
|
|
RE: Intel Win 7 benchmark results (Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout - which is best? )
BearPup | 03/27/09
|
|
Not everyone is incapable of adding RAM
racintazz@... | 04/19/09
|
|
vista=126 Xp=146 (lower is better)
kartikeyans@... | 06/30/09
|
|
simply amazing
paladin2 | 10/02/09
|
The Business Essentials Guide provides you useful tools and templates to help grow your business and save you time with automated shipping solutions.
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
