Everyone Should Know This
itanalyst2@... | 11/04/08
|

Prudent procedures
rag@... | 11/04/08
|

RE: Everyone Should Know This
fmhiggins | 11/04/08
|
 
Amateurs...
rag@... | 11/05/08
|
  
Then why sell an upgrade version?
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/06/08
|
   
And Joe Sixpack does not ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
    
You sure?
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/06/08
|
     
Bottom Line
mrjoctave@... | 11/07/08
|
     
And Microshaft...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/07/08
|
     
@ B83...
Wolfie2K3 | 11/08/08
|
     
Wolfie
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/10/08
|

One More!
aussieblnd@... | 11/05/08
|

Totally agree....
devlin_X | 11/05/08
|
Why is there still a 32 bit version?
Norcross | 11/04/08
|

And yet going to 64bit only would result in more compat claims. (NT)
logicearth@... | 11/04/08
|
 
Quite. No problems with Vista64 here...
HypnoToad | 11/04/08
|
  
They don't have a monopoly on RAM hogging...
Mike (not Cox) | 11/05/08
|
   
They don't have a monopoly on RAM hogging...
pauldoyle98@... | 11/05/08
|
   
You're welcome to come visit...
wright_is | 10/27/09
|

Do you have any references for this?
ye | 11/04/08
|
 
Around the time of the WinFS speak, I seem to recall.
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
  
So, the longhorn betas, not Vista.
rtk | 11/04/08
|
   
That's your job...
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/06/08
|
    
oh, good one
rtk | 11/06/08
|
     
Hey shill,
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/06/08
|
     
yo, troll
rtk | 11/06/08
|
     
Hey shill
hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 11/07/08
|
 
Who needs references for THAT? It is a DooDoo statement!
XweAponX | 11/09/08
|

Revisionist History.
ShadeTree | 11/04/08
|
 
Requires the latest hardware yet still does 32 bit ...
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
  
You're worse than a broken clock
rtk | 11/04/08
|
   
LOL, nice one.
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
   
Not if it's on ZULU time...
fairportfan | 11/05/08
|
    
ZULU? I think you mean 24-hour time.
*Gman* | 10/27/09
|
  
The more logical explanation would be
GuidingLight | 11/04/08
|
   
Said the amoeba to the monkey
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
    
so whats the point here?
mrjoctave@... | 11/07/08
|
    
...the rascal's to ...
jinxsm@... | 10/24/09
|
     
Where did you learn your grammar?
pfyearwood | 10/26/09
|
 
I'll give you two guesses but you're only going to need one nt
ye | 11/04/08
|
  
I'll give you two guesses but
Me_too | 11/20/08
|

Thunking layers
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
 
Not everything was rewritten genious. (NT)
logicearth@... | 11/04/08
|
  
Correct, and yet it was supposed to be "all new", dimwit.
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
   
And where did you hear everything was suppose to be rewritten? (NT)
logicearth@... | 11/05/08
|
    
It's all the little voices he hears...nt
socialism=nowhere | 10/26/09
|

64bit
Digital Video Expert | 11/04/08
|
 
MS don't care, it's just your money they're after ...
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
  
They sound just like you.
GuidingLight | 11/04/08
|
   
But you are buying it, all the time, from MS
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
    
64 bit may be neet, but 32 bit has been paid for
orignal_traveler | 11/05/08
|
     
you do realize...
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|
    
Ahh isn't that kettle calling the pot black..me thinks yes! - nt
socialism=nowhere | 10/26/09
|
 
Buy yourself the 64-bit version.
peter_erskine@... | 11/04/08
|
  
You mean like Apple?
ye | 11/04/08
|
 
Why do you care
rtk | 11/04/08
|
 
Vista 32 was incompatible anyway, so why not 64?
BillDem | 11/04/08
|
  
Dang, you're rich.
HypnoToad | 11/04/08
|
   
More FUD than Elmer FUDD
gennx30 | 11/04/08
|
   
Why settle for 98% with effort when I can have 100% with zero effort?
BillDem | 11/05/08
|
  
You have a funny definition of 'respect'.
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|
   
What planet have you been living on lately?
twirth5@... | 10/26/09
|

Would the software vendors be ready?
mystic100 | 11/04/08
|
 
no problem for me on 64 bit, except one
pfyearwood | 10/26/09
|

FAIL!
de-void | 11/04/08
|
 
Um...
wolf_z | 11/05/08
|
  
XP 64bit wasn't mainstream, and it was more of a experament (NT)
logicearth@... | 11/05/08
|
  
yea
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|

Because there are still a lot of 32 bit machines.
bendib | 11/05/08
|
 
Uh.
Panda X | 11/05/08
|

BECAUSE
aussieblnd@... | 11/05/08
|
 
There are more 64bit capable CPUs then 5% (NT)
logicearth@... | 11/05/08
|
 
There are VERY FEW machines ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
  
Make that ...
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes | 11/06/08
|
  
For any machine less than 2 years old
Lerianis | 11/06/08
|
   
THey just say that..
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|

Well, yes but ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
Don't buy Windows, throw money into a cess pit instead.
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|

You would be the expert on Cess Pits that's for sure - nt
USTechHead | 11/04/08
|

Brilliant! As that would leave you
GuidingLight | 11/04/08
|
 
After I took my foot off your head ...
fr0thy2 | 11/04/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
CobraA1 | 11/04/08
|

They're minor wrt Vista but significant wrt XP.
ye | 11/04/08
|

Remember that "Windows 7" is ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|

Exactly right
Lerianis | 11/06/08
|
Interesting points
AndyCee | 11/04/08
|

Unlikely to need new HW!
de-void | 11/04/08
|

Nope, new hardware is not necessary ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
 
Yep, a video card upgrade
Lerianis | 11/06/08
|
Why not save yourself the trouble and go Nix or Mac?
T1Oracle | 11/04/08
|

What software am I going to lose?
mdemuth | 11/04/08
|

Because ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
And you can tell this from a Pre-Beta?
No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/04/08
|

Yes - because it is not a ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
amaugeri@... | 11/04/08
|

Change for the better
rag@... | 11/04/08
|
 
Lies!
Rnadmo | 11/05/08
|
Always clean install......
carlsf@... | 11/04/08
|

It's too early for X64-only ...
mwagner@... | 11/06/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
ghot@... | 11/04/08
|

And Windows 8 is going to be using Window 7 kernel. (NT)
logicearth@... | 11/04/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
ramnet@... | 11/04/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
dockc | 11/04/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
KHMJR | 11/04/08
|

Wrong.
NStalnecker | 11/05/08
|
I don't upgrade to Win7 at all: I stay with Vista
qmlscycrajg | 11/05/08
|
Good link
Kaiwai | 11/05/08
|
Clean Install Is All Fine And Good.....
CptMatt | 11/05/08
|

I just don't get it...
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
payton@... | 11/05/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
rbeier1116 | 11/05/08
|
Never clean install ever again
ragnar.moller@... | 11/05/08
|

I'll say it again...
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|
Valid Points but....
BroGnorik | 11/05/08
|

Re-install
aussieblnd@... | 11/05/08
|
 
Migration
mswift@... | 11/06/08
|
 
NOT a big deal
gnesterenko | 12/03/08
|

RE: Valid Points but....
Rhetticus | 10/24/09
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
Panda X | 11/05/08
|
Slow news day, huh?
QuimaxW | 11/05/08
|
I shudder to think
nospam@... | 11/05/08
|
Advise already exist since WIndows 95...
fstekele | 11/06/08
|
Hardly ever upgrade versus fresh install
Boot_Agnostic | 11/06/08
|
I do a parallel install / multiboot nowadays...
bachware | 11/06/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
jed@... | 11/07/08
|

..because "finding out about Linux" won't cost you time?
*Gman* | 10/27/09
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
bobmatch@... | 11/08/08
|
Windows 7 = Windows Vista Tweaked Properly
pcwizkid.tech.talk@... | 11/11/08
|

http://youtube.com/PWizKid BAD LINK!
sdburr@... | 11/11/08
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
ssalemi@... | 11/19/08
|
Upgrade ot Scratch
frj111@... | 01/12/09
|
RE: Don't upgrade to Windows 7 ... clean install instead!
Rhetticus | 10/24/09
|