On mySimon: Tom Ford Aviator Sunglasses
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 19 of 43:
Next »
« Previous
This study looked at ...
'publicly available' information. It didn't look at what the
companies did, merely what they said they did, or were
going to do.

For example:

"Review: 0/22 points. Climate Counts found no publicly
available information..."

"Policy Stance: 0/10 points. Climate Counts found no
public information..."

"Report: 3/12 points. Climate Counts has found that Apple
has made some public information available..."

Much like the Greenpeace report, which called HP "good"
for having a plan for future RoHS compliance, but called
Apple "partially bad," even though it already complies with
RoHS standards.

Bad press for Apple is good press for these groups. After
all, how many newspapers and blogs would pick up
"Lenovo bad for environment?"
Posted by: msalzberg   Posted on: 05/13/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

This is bull!  klumper | 05/09/08
A threw away an apple just last week...  Stuka | 05/09/08
RE: Climate Counts tells climate-conscious buyers to avoid Apple  nrkmann@... | 05/10/08
What did Climate Counts count?  msalzberg | 05/10/08
The mantra of the left  Richard Flude | 05/12/08
It's interesting to note  Lizzie_B | 05/10/08
ZDNET is all about micro blogs and nothing NEWS  groovepoint@... | 05/10/08
Low marks  Len Rooney | 05/11/08
RE: Climate Counts tells climate-conscious buyers to avoid Apple  progon | 05/11/08
"Legion of bad manufacturing practices?"  msalzberg | 05/11/08
I'm a moron.  msalzberg | 05/11/08
Yep  tikigawd | 05/12/08
Yeah, they would be bankrupt  fatrat | 06/03/08
What is the difference?  peter_erskine@... | 05/11/08
Everything but the i686...  odubtaig | 05/12/08
Probably not just the PC  LiquidLearner | 05/12/08
What point?  Len Rooney | 05/12/08
Since you're asking for evidence...  tikigawd | 05/12/08
This study looked at ...  msalzberg | 05/13/08
Just Adrians personal Vendetta against Apple.  mrlinux | 05/12/08
Personally there are other areas I'd worry about first  voska1 | 05/12/08
Climate counts.....  croberts | 05/12/08
Greanpeace admitted that Apple wasn't any worse...  olePigeon | 05/12/08
The post is about "Climate Counts"  markbn | 05/12/08
They are not the same, but the agenda is. [nt]  olePigeon | 05/12/08
Apple claims that Apple is greenest?  odubtaig | 05/13/08
hardly matters  coffeeshark | 05/12/08
Environmental peudo-science mumbo-jumbo  srobtjones@... | 05/12/08
Who are these guys anyway what rock did they  marks055@... | 05/12/08
That's it?  odubtaig | 05/13/08
like the IPCC has a subjective viewpoint  marks055@... | 05/13/08
The word you are looking for is objective.  odubtaig | 05/14/08
RE: Climate Counts tells climate-conscious buyers to avoid Apple  bahamude | 05/12/08
Hey, just check what Al Gore uses!?  techboy_z | 05/12/08
So how much do they want $$$  marks055@... | 05/12/08
sigh: another libel artist on the net.  odubtaig | 05/13/08
Expect a bitter response from "Roughlydrafted"  markbn | 05/12/08
Eco-Extortion  MarcB_z | 05/12/08
You got any proof,  odubtaig | 05/13/08
RE: Climate Counts tells climate-conscious buyers to avoid Apple  dysart | 05/13/08
Oops put this in the wrong place  dysart | 05/13/08
Must be an 'American' thing.  odubtaig | 05/13/08
Don't think so  laura.b | 05/13/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here