On TechRepublic: Why Linux will triumph over Windows
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 43:
Next »
You are being mean
If the MacBook Air really isn?t up to web browsing and email, then maybe this system should ship with a Vista Capable (or should that be Vista Incapable) sticker on it.

Mean, but absolutely hilarious!!!! happy

Maybe [url=http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=399] Ed Bott can work some of his magic [/url] on Jason's MBA too?
Posted by: NonZealot   Posted on: 03/26/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

You are being mean  NonZealot | 03/26/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  LoneWolf367 | 03/26/08
what is the spec on you mac mini...  doctorSpoc | 03/26/08
It's the 4200RPM HDD  electronista | 03/26/08
I agree. HDD, nothing to do with CPU or RAM  james.faction | 03/26/08
...  Linux User 147560 | 03/26/08
+ that Flock is a real RAM-hog, and so is VMWare  Mikael_z | 03/26/08
The SSD isn't much faster, even in Apple's own tests.  nix_hed | 03/26/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  theoxygenthief | 03/26/08
Not slow at all..  zenwalker | 03/28/08
here too...  doh123 | 03/29/08
Could be overheating  Question everything | 03/26/08
Toshiba; 1.7Ghz, 2GB RAM, Vista Business  Lawnmower233 | 03/26/08
it doesn't...  doh123 | 03/29/08
Compromise  itpro_z | 03/26/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  MattiasW | 03/26/08
HDD Flock  srobtjones@... | 03/26/08
Yeah  Stuka | 03/26/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  Loverock Davidson | 03/26/08
Its Flock  Stuka | 03/26/08
Yes, Flock  bryantrv | 03/26/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  nix_hed | 03/26/08
My lower spec'd Toshiba R200 works fine  ye | 03/26/08
first gen MBP  doh123 | 03/29/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  snaconst | 03/26/08
Get it serviced  People | 03/26/08
So much for Get A Mac - It Just Works!!  NonZealot | 03/26/08
never fails, eh?  lostarchitect | 03/27/08
what?  doh123 | 03/29/08
Is the HDD an IDE?  croberts | 03/26/08
1.8", 4200rpm, PATA (nt)  Stuka | 03/27/08
Some intelligent dude here?  theo_durcan | 03/26/08
Except the author didn't ...  ShadeTree | 03/27/08
Where do you read that?  theo_durcan | 03/27/08
Maybe it's your turn to check out Jason's MBA  Ken_z | 03/26/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  God of Biscuits | 03/26/08
Question for you  laura.b | 03/27/08
Nicely Said and right on the money - NT  socialism=nowhere | 03/27/08
Too much RDF Kool-Aid  hasta la Vista, bah-bie | 03/27/08
Why is Mackbook Air ....  ShadeTree | 03/27/08
incoherent piffle  credulousDolt | 03/27/08
Read the article before commenting on it. The subject line is WRONG  d_a_keldsen | 03/27/08
RE: 1.6GHz processor and 2GB of RAM not enough for Mac OS X?!?!  skipdog172@... | 03/27/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here